Skip to main content

Micro Vs. Macro Factors in Canada

Facts:

Inflation in Canada is just shy of 2% (mid range target)
200,000 new jobs were created in the first 4 months of 2010
Retail sales rose 2.1% (YoY) in March 2010
Very little economic news out of Canada this week

But over the past 30 days:
    Oil prices down 20% from USD 86 to USD 68
    Copper prices down 17% from USD 3.6 to USD3.0
    Canadian dollar down 6% from parity with the USD to 0.94.

The situation in Canada is interesting, insofar as for the first time in over a year, the Canadian dollar is trading near or at its fair value.  It could give a break to (manufacturing) exporters, but many of them have been aggressively hedging their short term US dollar exposure – a reasonable decision, but it means that over the next 6-12 months they will not benefit from a weaker dollar.  That has implication for growth expectation from ¼ of Canada’s economy (manufacturing).  The energy complex and natural resource sector are also hurting both from a drop in price (especially copper which is considered a bell weather), but also a “contagion” of new taxes on resource extraction – Alberta started the ball rolling in 2007, and last week Australia upped the antes!  

For the BoC’ 30% of Canada’s economy became more exposed to external inflation pressures (the proportion of GDP that is made up of imports), because of the recent weakness of the Canadian dollar – however, the BoC doesn’t take into consideration exchange rates when making decisions about monetary policy – although external factors are probably a key component of the BoC’s decision to increase rates on June 1st.  Like David Rosenberg, I believe that the likelihood if a rate hike is around 40% -- if we hear more rumors of quantitative easing, the BoC’s hands will be tied and no rate hike, in fact if the s/t and m/t vision is of deflation the yield curve will flatten out – it’s the long end that will come in, not the short end that will go out.  

For the BoC one the core sector worries has been the overheating housing market, Both in 2009 and in the first five months of 2010 it has been Canada’s engine of growth – nearly 30% of all jobs created over the first 4 months of 2010 were in housing or related sectors. There now appears to be a slow down in housing market, which nominally could make the BoC more cautious and hold back on raising rates.

The title of this note reflects the decision tree faced by the BoC over the summer.  The rest of the world appears to be imploding, while Canada remains largely steady – it’s easy to forget that over the past 5 months the Canadian equity market has been more or less static, the S&P500 is down about 5% since January 1st.  China is down 25% and Europe is “off a cliff” due to its troubles.  I mentioned in a previous post that Europe is not a major market for Canadian exports (the UK is about as big as the rest of Europe), but it remains that the budget cuts announced by the British Government (USD 8.6 billion in 2010), Italy (USD 29 billion), and Spain (USD 80 billion), is going to directly impact these countries GDP – it has to, its simply impossible for private enterprise to replace this lost GDP, so for each of the UK, Italy and Spain it represents at least 1% to 2% in GDP reduction, which means that these countries may find themselves in negative territory.  The “second hand smoke” risk to Canada is clear.  All these countries will require fewer things – which means they will need less raw materials, which means that raw material prices will have to fall – as they have over the past few weeks.

As a commentator once said about one of Evil Kenevil’s motorcycle failed stunts – That’s gotta hurt!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...