Skip to main content

Of International Banking Operations

A bit of a tangent today, in a sense I am proud of my employer decisions.  About 10 years ago, my employer decided to shut down the vast majority of its foreign operations (Before my time), keeping a small (funding) operation in London, and two regional offices in other major European cities.  These limited European operations generate a small profit for the firm; they have limited aspirations and do an excellent job.

Our firm is a smaller financial institution, and having international operations to “follow our clients” just didn’t make any sense.  My own experience working in London, New York and Singapore for very large financial institutions would also justify similar decision.  Our “home” clients were just not interested in working with us (and when I say us, I mean three different institutions from three different continents…).  Bottom line, our “home” client wanted local market expertise, and not some overpaid expatriate douche bag which had gotten off the boat two weeks earlier! (I wish I was making this up, but this actually happened – a German colleague (almost no English) investment banker debarked in Singapore and started pitching German clients his local expertise – he got lost driving back his “clients” to the airport…needless to say that this client took his business elsewhere!)

This morning, the royal Bank of Canada unveiled its results for the first quarter, the numbers were good, but all the profits were generated by the domestic operations.  The foreign operations were once again a drag on profits.  RBC is Canada’s premier financial institution, with a market cap of nearly $90 billion it stands shoulder to shoulder with some of the world’s largest banks (JPM and BoA are both around $154 billion in market cap).  RBC has been active in Europe and South America for more than a century.  It is a well established player in these markets.  Despite this RBC’s foreign operations almost never make a profit, and generally produce losses (as they have in the first quarter of 2010 – with a $27 million loss, which is better than the $1.1 billion loss for 2009, still…).

My point is that if one of the best run international banks is unable to generate consistent profits from its international operations, what chance do medium sized banks have, and why do so many try? My guess is habit, looking at the annual report of their competitors; banks decided that they too needed a foreign presence.  My guess is that those strategies are never fully though-out 

My employer decided that instead to strike agreements with strong local financial institutions.  Has it paid off?  Hard to say, our clients appear happy, they get our “seal of approval” and introduction to the right people, do we get the same kind of referral, no we don’t, but then there’s not that much interest in investing in Canada – on the other hand we have virtually not costs associated with the endeavor.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more