Skip to main content

Inflation is becoming a real problem in Canada

This morning from Statistics Canada:
Consumer prices rose 3.7% in the 12 months to May, the largest increase since March 2003. This follows a 3.3% increase posted in April. The increase in May was primarily a result of higher gasoline prices.
Granted that most of this increase was food and energy (respectively 5% and 16%), yet it remains that the 3.3% registered in April was suppose to be (according the Bank of Canada) a peak, and now it appears that the peak is even higher.  Virtually all sectors saw price rise (excluding clothing), with transportation the worse affected (since fuel costs are a very large component of this sector...).  


(Source: StatsCan)

The Canadian authorities are taking a very aggressive stance vis-a-vis the risk of exogenous shocks, the BoC's recent risk assessment tot he global financial system shows greater stress than 12 months ago, and yet the internal numbers are worrying.  Will the BoC eventually be forced to "overreact" on interest rate if it waits much longer. The Canadian market has largely discounted a rate rise  before May 2012 (Q2/2012), but of course this is only the futures market, that opinion can "change on a dime".  It remains that inflation pressures are strong in Canada due to "local" risks (a booming economy).  

I am no longer ready to put money on the table for a rate rise, but there is no doubt that as an investor, my fixed income duration exposure will remain relatively short (the 5y range), simply because the BoC eventual rate rise will probably not shift the yield curve, rather they will affect the slope of the curve (which works well for intermediary duration exposure).  I'm not that bright, but the steepness of the Canadian yield curve is near "historical" highs.

The current and inexplicable position adopted by the BoC brings to mind my reaction to the U.S. and U.K's initial decision to invade Iraq "they must have data that shows WMD that they are not releasing, they are just not revealing everything!"  I was naive, in fact, they had nothing and were actually goosing the data to create a false positive on WMD.  Again here I assume that Mark Carney (Governor BoC) has non-public information on the state of the global economy that worries him to such a point that he is concerned with an exogenous shock!  Maybe I am being naive here too?

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more