Skip to main content

Think of the Greek parliamentarian’s dilemma

At 9 PM (GMT) the Greek parliament will vote on confidence vote with regards to the government’s proposed austerity economic strategy. The question is how will the opposition vote?

Greece’s problem is that the current administration discovered that public finance were a mess, far worse than anticipated. In fact, they discovered that total debt was three times higher than had been previously revealed. The prime minister tried to form a national unity collation, the opposition would have none of this (why share the blame). Now the opposition has three choices: Support, reject or abstain. My guess is that they will be blamed even if they abstain – since the government would win the confidence vote. So they will have to choose between elections -- maybe taking power and having to solve the mess themselves or support the current administration, and let them suffer the eventual electoral backlash. Difficult calculations if you “believe” that more debt is the solution (in my opinion it is not), but easier if you believe that the ECB/IMF have only kicked the can down the road with the hope that an eventual pain free solution emerge.

Once you believe that the solution lays in negotiating with the ECB/IMF a new deal (including hair cuts for foreign private creditors) then Greece has a chance to make it! Clearly remaining in the Euro area is out of the question. Transition out of the Euro is complex but not impossible.

The solution will not please the ECB, but then, everyone knew that Greece was faking the stats when it joined the Euro – and yet no one said anything!

My gut feeling is that the opposition will support the government, because the next 8 to 12 months are going to be horrible for anyone in power. Might as well be the other guy! I was wrong, eventually the vote was down to party lines.  The opposition decided that they had nothing to gain in supporting the government.

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...