Skip to main content

Maybe I should have taken his bet!

Several weeks ago, during a heated discussion on oil prices a good friend told me:  "You believe that oil prices are going down, put your money where you mouth is"

The bet was for oil to hit $30 before it would hit $50.  That bet -- was a sucker bet.  The marginal market is unknowable.  That's simply the truth is that one serious global event and oil prices can jump back to $80.  What is more interesting is where will oil be in 24 or 48 months.  Will it remain as cheap as today.

There are a number of factors at play:

  • Producers the world over have gotten use to the $80/100 bbl economic windfall; enabling them to buy off their citizen -- from Caracas to  Ryad the plan has been "buy off the natives"
  • US producers of expensive shall gas and oil have used "expensive" debt to fund their development.  Sunk costs are sunk!  Right now they are pumping as much as they can so that they can meet interest payments.  But soon even variable costs will not be covered.
  • Nearly 50% of all high yield debt is issued by E&P companies...
  • There are no massive growth pushes out there.  America just raised interest rates.  Although several economies have gone "negative" the overall impact is not working out as planned as banks are actually raising interest rates on consumer loans
  • 2016 is election year in America -- there will be no further tightening by the Feds (there may even be a reversal
  • America, as a net energy exporter, doesn't benefit from lower energy prices

So there we have it; oil (the sweetest kind) briefly dipped below $34 -- now around $35.  The trend tells me that oil prices are not done falling, at least until some fundamentals start changing.  The producers need to cash to keep the population happy, and users are in the same boat they've been for the past 12 months -- lower oil prices have not stimulated demand.

I shoulda taken that bet!


On a side note, yesterday I "fell" on a copper -- as value investing, video on you tube.  This video was from a guy who bought some pre 1983 pennies which with 95% copper content were worth twice as much as their face value.  That's when copper was trading around $4,000 a ton.  Today coper is around $2,000 a ton -- so our friend, who bought is pennies at a slight premium to their face value -- plus stored them for nearly 3 years is siting on an investment worth exactly what he paid for.  

Turns out it was a good store of value -- he didn't make a fortune, but on the other hand he didn't lose anything (aside from holding costs and inflation).  However, had he invested in the stock market his worth (assuming no tax impact) would have risen by nearly 50%.  Soooo maybe not the greatest strategy EVER!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more