Skip to main content

Energy loans are now causing systemic risks to US banks

"The Dallas Fed met with the banks a week ago and effectively suspended mark-to-market on energy debts and as a result no impairments are being written down. Furthermore, as we reported earlier this week, the Fed indicated 'under the table' that banks were to work with the energy companies on delivering without a markdown on worry that a backstop, or bail-in, was needed after reviewing loan losses which would exceed the current tier 1 capital tranches."
Zero Hedge, January 18,2015
That's more like it!  There is no doubt that the US bank's exposure to the drilling sector was large. Ideally, for the banks was to issue bonds (Junk, but they like to call them High Yield...) that was the feed for the US energy sector over the past 5 years.  Almost any project was fundable, because extraction costs were around $50/$60 and prices were around $80/$90.  As of 9:00 am today oil prices (WTI) are trading around $29.95, so that producers are maximising output so as to pay variable costs.  However, banks still "normally" would show loan impairment.  Covenants are breached and the prudent thing is to take loan loss provisions, that would reflect in a mark to market of the loans -- now it appears that there is, like in 2008, an agreement to "suspend" this mark to market rule, so as to not impact Tier one capital.

Now, that's a worrying development.  The implication is that banks have sufficiently large exposure to the E&P sector, which is clearly distressed, so as to have Tier one implication for the banks. Shows that the regulator took the line and the sinker, when it agreed to banks excessive exposure to that sector.  Compare this to Canada, where the Oil Sands business is far more affected, but where the banks are only discussing minor impairment in the Western portfolio.

The US is not in a recession, granted growth is not as robust as it could be, but it is still positive.  Yet the banks are forced to take action on their mark to market rules as to avoid impairment.  This indicate that the banks were, once again, imprudent in their lending activities... I saw the big short a few nights ago, nice story, but it shows that the banks have learned once lesson very well, privatize the profits and socialize the losses -- the American tax payer is a sucker, and should be exploited.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more