Skip to main content

Trump's State of the Union

The highlights:

(1)  Down with regulations!-- that may work, but then giving the right to industry to pollute -- are we back to rivers on fire.  After all the lack of regulations has been so good for China, maybe America should imitate.  Some of the finance regulations are pointless.  Not sure that killing the consumer protection bureau is such a hot idea.  Also not sure I buy the job-killing thing, America is near full employment now.

(2) Killing the TPP is good for the economy!:  not sure it was and it excluded China which seems to be idiotic anyway.  The jury is out on that one.  Those who remain in the TPP can still agree to something, but without China and America it's a little pointless

(3) Drugs is a real problem in America and we will do something about it!:  That's pie in the sky, for more than 40 years America has tried to eradicate drugs without success.  Drugs have never been cheaper.  This is a waste of time and effort filling the prisons for nothing, reform it lique alcohool and gambling (Trump should know).

(4)  Government's job is to serve and protect its citizen!:  Which begs the question why is trump growing the military budget by 9% -- what is it that America's armed forces can do with $665 billion that it could not do with $603 billion?

(5)  America cannot be home to terrorists!:  Clearly hinting at immigration policy and anti foreigner objectives.  If you assume that every foreigner is a terrorist...you have a problem.  But indiscriminate bombing in the Middle East is not a way of making friends.  They may consider that America is acting like a terrorist -- creating fear

(6) A large percentage of Americans live in poverty!:  An absolute truth there is no doubt about that.

(7) Jobs that were lost because of NAFTA!; Simply not true, the restructuring of the American manufacturing system pre-dates NAFTA it is a consequence of comparative advantages; NAFTA may have speeded up the process but it was already moving in that direction.

(8)  Overseas Trump's administration inherited a number of disasters:  Yes, true but there are always overseas disasters -- so far Trump has not been very helpful in reducing tensions.  If anything he has exacerbated them (Taiwan, NATO, Crimea, EU etc etc)

(9) Tax Reform for all!:  The juicy bit of the presentation.  Trump's desire to cut corporate tax is great idea if it is accompanied by massive cuts in loopholes, for while the US tax rates are very high, actual tax paid in the US tend to be on the low side.  But killing loopholes will be very hard (huge contributors to Congress' re-election funds).  Cutting taxes to the middle class is hard to believe, every Republican administration that has cut taxes has cut taxes in a way that 80% of benefits when to the top 5%, the rest got the 20%.  Border tax adjustment (which is VAT in another name) is complicated to administer but simple in concept.

(10) Back to immigration:  Frankly his point system is a good idea, it's what is used in Canada -- I agree with that one

(11)  $ 1 trillion in infrastructure!:  Not while a republican congress is there, the combination of tax cuts and massive infrastructure will create a massively larger deficit.  I just don't see it.

(12)  Kill the ACA and implement a new better and cheaper plan:  That's simply not going to happen.  The Republicans cannot agree on a way forward, and there are process in the work to shut the ACA down immediately (which is what some member of Congress want).  Health care reform is DOA.  As en example of how far the GOP is from a serious platform to deal with people with pre-existing conditions the total annual cost (estimated by the CBO) is somewhere near $150 billion per annum (which sounds like a lot -- but it's only $ 3,000 per person if 50 million have pre-existing conditions).  Total amount that the republicans want to spend on that is $1 billion per annum.  1/150 of the amount needed. Trump has no idea how to fix it, doesn't have the political capital to use on this and doesn't have the attention span.

The jobs will not return to America, the republicans will not support the infrastructure projects because they have no money or interest in these issues.  Health care will return to the status quo ante, tax reform will do great for the good and the rich, the rest can go screw themselves.  Congress has a different view (as does Bannon) cut ACA, cut Medicare and Medicaid, vouchers for schools, shut down EPA, Agriculture, Education and cut taxes for the rich and corporation.  Make the Federal government so small that it is no longer an issue.

 Anyway, a nice speech but the good stuff is simply undeliverable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...