Skip to main content

Getting it right too soon -- as bad as getting it wrong!

In March 2014 I wrote:
The economics have changed the smart money has moved on.  So the markets are freaking out!  Moreover that's for the housing prices, considering the damage that Amazon is doing to the average mall (without generating any real profits) it amazes me how well commercial real estate income trust continue to perform.  I cannot remember the last time I bought goods in a store.  So the malls are dying and real estate is back in trouble.  However, this time around the guys suffering are hedge funds and their "rich" investors-- and not the banks.  My guess is that Congress will pass new "hedge fund saving legislation" very quickly.  After all, you got to support the guy who got you elected.

I wrote this three years ago, and although  today Malls are in real trouble, it took much much longer than anticipated to go from being a negative trend to a route.  On the bright side there is virtually no (economical) way these days to short REITs, but should you have taken a position 3 years ago, the red ink of the trade would have killed you.

OK it is well know that America has a special love for Malls -- years ago I was given direction to a restaurant (sports bar) as "Look its just over there -- two malls to the right, and you will find it!". This morning the Atlantic had a piece on Malls, and showed an interesting statistic:


Cannot think of better proof that there are too many Malls -- but the reality is that its been a long and on going trend.  The article goes on to say that there are two trends:

(1) People do their research on-line
(2) People buy more on line

These are not the same thing, in the past, shoppers would go to a mall several times to investigate the purchase of a large good -- sofa was their example, each time they would be side-tracked and do other purchase (new shoes etc etc).  Now the research is done on line -- because often the store doesn't have the "knowledge" and they arrive in the store ready to make the "big purchase".  All these side trips are gone.  The chain stores have made sure that this was going to be the inevitable conclusion; be reducing staffing levels (cost) and high turnover insured that they staff knew little if anything about the goods they were selling -- they often had to go on the internet to find the color of fabric...

People buy massively more online, Amazon grew from $16 billion in sales (2010) to nearly $80 billion in sales today -- to give a scope to that, its equivalent to 4 times Sears sales...

The direction of the mall (or the store) can only go one way -- down.  Another technology that I cover, self driving cars. Lets say that you want specific medicine, and instead of going to the nearest drug store, the drug store comes to you -- its physical presence is a truck -- or van.  

America's baby boomers are retiring and changing their shopping habits -- the millennials have very different demands -- try pawning off a sofa to your son or daughter, a dare you!  They want less stuff, regularly unclutter their lives -- granted when they have children it changes a little, still they remain frugal in their consumption.

Back to my story, I was right, absolutely right in 2014, that the great retail bonanza of the 1990 was over, I didn't get how long it would take for all these stores to give up the ghost, and that as a trader can be the biggest mistake!



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more