Skip to main content

Calculating the impact of tarrifs on the price of dryers! Law of unintended consequences

Over the weekend a study came out here which showed that the price of dryers (washers too by the way) had risen by an average of US$ 90.00 per machine.

Following the imposition of tariffs (and aluminum too) on washing machines, some manufacturing was relocated to the US.  It is estimated that nearly 2,000 jobs were created.  As an individual that is suddenly working at manufacturing washing machines in the US, for them it's a good thing -- they have a job.  For everyone else (who is buying a washing machine) its a bad thing.

The number came out and what was surprising is that after years of falling prices for washer&dryers the price suddenly shot up.  In fact, and that's the interesting part, not only did the price of foreign washing machine rise, so did the price of domestic ones.   The total cost of the tariffs has been estimated at US$ 1.5 billion -- the Treasury department got about US$ 78 million and the rest was for the benefits of the new workers (yeah) and to their employer (ok they too).

Now what didn't appear in this study is the increase in the cost of aluminum.  Also subject to import duty so some of the increase in the price of washers & dryers could be factored to an increase in the cost of aluminum.

However, for the economy as a whole, the cost of tariffs has been US$ 1.5 billion or about US$ 800,000 per job!   You can assume that of the 800,000 the vast majority goes to the American companies that manufacture washing machines.  But what is truly amazing, hence the "unintended consequence" is the rise in the price of dryers -- where no tariffs have been imposed.  It seems that there is a balance between the price of washing machine and dryer -- and that manufacturers were able to not only pass on the cost of the tariffs but in absolute terms boost the price of white good equipment. 

There is no loss here, but there is an economic transfer between the manufacturers and the consumer, to the tune of US$ 1.5 billion -- it's clear that in Trumps' world this is an acceptable exchange between the two parts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...