Skip to main content

VIA Rail --- big secret Toronto Montreal high speed link better without including Quebec City

So CTV news came out with  "secret report" commissioned by ViaRail that to build a $4 billion high-speed rail link should not include Quebec City...now that's a real surprise!  (no not really at all).  The world's investment banks have been telling ViaRail that the most logical option was actually to "exclude" Montreal and Quebec City from a high-speed corridor.  Now, this analysis was done 20 years ago (I know I was the architect of one of these studies -- I know at least two other IB guys who said the same thing, something that ViaRail didn't want to hear at the time).   To give you a sense of timing all this took place prior to 9/11.  Since then Montreal has grown tremendously -- slowly catching up to the rest of Canada!

Our conclusion, at the time, was there very little demand for travel from Quebec City to Toronto and only marginal traffic to Ottawa that was served daily (with a 42 seat aircraft), don't know the aircraft now, but there is still only one direct flight per day...20 years on!  It was impossible at the time to justify a high-speed rail link (there is already a relatively fast train between Quebec City and Montreal -- the added speed is probably not worth the effort -- more interesting would have been higher frequency).

Anyway, the results still show today, 20 years later that there is very little demand for traffic between Quebec City and Ottawa and Toronto, the added speed between Montreal and Quebec City would be better served with higher frequencies rather than a high-speed train.

Transport economics is interesting and most people misunderstand the working components; obviously, the time it takes to get from A to B is important, but that's not all -- there is also convenient to get to city-center (where trains win big) and also, even more importantly, frequency.  If there are only two trains a day, and you miss the train, your total journey time has increased dramatically since you have to wait for the next train.

It is actually the argument being made for improving rail services to the suburbs should be done by increasing frequency -- if the travel time is 30 minutes by train but you've got to wait 1 hour between trains, then your average travel time is 60 minutes (30+30), but if there's a train at the 15 minutes then your travel time is 37 minutes (30+7).  Frequency is key, and it actually promotes ridership.

The other issue, high speed, let's say that Quebec City to Montreal can justify 4 trains a day ( not impossible but it means 2,000 riders per day -- on average).  Because of the rail configuration and the right of way for freight trains higher speed link would require brand new rails.  Still the distance of 250 KM, right now the train takes 3 hours, you could reduce that slightly by having a deal with CN (maybe) so that the train could attain a top speed of 150 KM/h, but right now they are limited to 100 km per hour.

Anyway, once again ViaRail doesn't want to hear the truth, that demand for high speed rail is really in the Windsor, Toronto, Ottawa corridor....Montreal could be added but the cost would be substantial because of the building of so many viaducts. 

Anyway, the secret is out!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu