Skip to main content

VIA Rail --- big secret Toronto Montreal high speed link better without including Quebec City

So CTV news came out with  "secret report" commissioned by ViaRail that to build a $4 billion high-speed rail link should not include Quebec City...now that's a real surprise!  (no not really at all).  The world's investment banks have been telling ViaRail that the most logical option was actually to "exclude" Montreal and Quebec City from a high-speed corridor.  Now, this analysis was done 20 years ago (I know I was the architect of one of these studies -- I know at least two other IB guys who said the same thing, something that ViaRail didn't want to hear at the time).   To give you a sense of timing all this took place prior to 9/11.  Since then Montreal has grown tremendously -- slowly catching up to the rest of Canada!

Our conclusion, at the time, was there very little demand for travel from Quebec City to Toronto and only marginal traffic to Ottawa that was served daily (with a 42 seat aircraft), don't know the aircraft now, but there is still only one direct flight per day...20 years on!  It was impossible at the time to justify a high-speed rail link (there is already a relatively fast train between Quebec City and Montreal -- the added speed is probably not worth the effort -- more interesting would have been higher frequency).

Anyway, the results still show today, 20 years later that there is very little demand for traffic between Quebec City and Ottawa and Toronto, the added speed between Montreal and Quebec City would be better served with higher frequencies rather than a high-speed train.

Transport economics is interesting and most people misunderstand the working components; obviously, the time it takes to get from A to B is important, but that's not all -- there is also convenient to get to city-center (where trains win big) and also, even more importantly, frequency.  If there are only two trains a day, and you miss the train, your total journey time has increased dramatically since you have to wait for the next train.

It is actually the argument being made for improving rail services to the suburbs should be done by increasing frequency -- if the travel time is 30 minutes by train but you've got to wait 1 hour between trains, then your average travel time is 60 minutes (30+30), but if there's a train at the 15 minutes then your travel time is 37 minutes (30+7).  Frequency is key, and it actually promotes ridership.

The other issue, high speed, let's say that Quebec City to Montreal can justify 4 trains a day ( not impossible but it means 2,000 riders per day -- on average).  Because of the rail configuration and the right of way for freight trains higher speed link would require brand new rails.  Still the distance of 250 KM, right now the train takes 3 hours, you could reduce that slightly by having a deal with CN (maybe) so that the train could attain a top speed of 150 KM/h, but right now they are limited to 100 km per hour.

Anyway, once again ViaRail doesn't want to hear the truth, that demand for high speed rail is really in the Windsor, Toronto, Ottawa corridor....Montreal could be added but the cost would be substantial because of the building of so many viaducts. 

Anyway, the secret is out!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more