Skip to main content

Aeromar -- the Mexican Army solution...

 Sometimes you get a trifecta, and with the above, I get that; it's about Mexico, it's about the airline industry and it's about the Mexican government.  Reading what is being said about that plan makes you realize that there's a sucker born every minute.

The Mexican airline business is not doing well, too rapid an expansion, with declining margins, insufficient capital and aggressive unions that have created financially tricky situations.  In addition, you add Covid and the loss by Mexico of its Schedule A carrier rights and you have a difficult situation for airline owners, who rightly carry a large portion of the blame for their difficulties.

Still, Aeromar is a small regional carrier with 12 aircraft, all of them aging ATR (turboprop) that operate a domestic service across Mexico.  The airline has a lot of debt and a lot of problems (as I mentioned above) and the owners are looking for additional capital.

Enters the military that is looking to capitalize on their current businesses; The logic so far is that by being vertically integrated, owning the airport, controlling the airspace and owning an airline it would be a winning formula for the military to make money.

First (of many) problems with this logic; the airline's two "additional hubs" would be the airport of Tulum and the New airport in Mexico City (n addition to the secondary hub of Guadelahara that it currently operates).  So the logic here seems to be to operate out of "new" but secondary airports, rather than from the big airports in Cancun or Mexico City.  why this is a problem?  Simply they give up all the international traffic; travellers will not use Tulum or the new Mexico City airport because they are pure domestic plays.  Therefore, this airline would only attract Mexican traffic, to domestic leisure destinations

Secondly, unless Mexico changes the rules of aircraft priority (and IATA may have issues with that), what the military seems to be suggesting is that by controlling airport, airline and air traffic they will be able to extract monopoly rent from travellers.  It would be difficult for a military-owned airline to get preferential treatment, but if it did, other carriers would find a way around that problem, at any rate, operating out of secondary airports negates that "advantage" since they are generally very quiet anyway and have a lot of excess capacity.

Third, operating an airline is difficult, and running one profitably is even more difficult.  If that is the real aim.  Old saying how do you become a millionaire as an airline owner -- start as a multi-millionaire!

Forth, current Mexican law prohibits the ownership of an airline by an airport operator...

I would suggest the following, having seen dealings with the Mexican military establishment in the past, that organization has a huge problem of corruption at all levels.  One way of looking at this would be to say that Aeromar needs new aircraft, its main domestic rival, TAR Aerolineas operates a leased fleet of small 50-seat jet that command premium prices by users because of their selected destinations.

The Mexican military is not the first who have thought of that idea, in fact, there is a long track record of military entities owning airlines.  It has been a disaster, and a good way to lose money.  However, there are other reasons to want to own an airline...these make it more probable that the Mexican military will find a way to own both the airports and an airline.  Mexico should not expect a profitable enterprise, but that's probably beside the point









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Tariffs on inhabited Island

 Two seldom-visited islands, part of Australia, saw a massive increase in the tariffs they will face when exporting to the United States.   The 32,000 residents did not have much to say...being Penguines.   NO kidding, massive tariffs were imposed on Heard Island and McDonald Islands.  According to the Australian government, the last visitor to Heard was about a decade ago.   Never mind the 47% tariff on Madagascar, where the principal export is Vanilla and the GDP per capita is less than $500 a year. Not only a Stable Genus but evidently an administration that took all of two hours to proof the list of countries.    They also treated St Pierre & Miquelon, two islands part of France in the middle of the St Lawrence Gulf...
Post a Comment
Read more

Britain, France and Egypt

 The voters realize now that the Conservative Praty desire to return to 19th-century dominance has driven its hatred of the EU.  The voters realize now that departure from the EU has accelerated Britain's decline and may soon make it irrelevant.  At best it will have to kiss American arses to maintain its standing.  For this, the conservatives were punished.  The decline of Britain was inevitable, competition from Frankfurt and Germany in Finance was bound to grow.  The core of Europe (aka Germany) is aging quickly Macron seems to be winning his bet, the left alliance that won the legislative elections will not remain united for long, since they disagree on about everything.   The Far right though it was about to assume power is once again relegated to the back of the bus.   It may draw its own conclusions, but not all of these are good for France.  The far-right has won nearly 1/3rd of the electorate, that is not something to be ig...
Post a Comment
Read more