Skip to main content

trade agreements

 over the weekend, Saturday night to be precise, I joined several university colleagues for an annual get together in Cambridge. In total, there’s about 20 of us, not every year as everyone available, but as we grow older, and reminisce more about our lives, more and more are present. This year, the entire group was together for the first time in almost a decade. 

One of the participant works for the government. His career has not been spectacular, but has been consistent through all administration over the past 20 years. He is considered by all as an expert in his field. We were sitting together, nursing a brandy, when asked point blank, how the British government had achieved a trade agreement with the Americans in such a short period of time.

his answer was telling, he said well the home team needed a win, and Trump also needed a win, so we signed a shorthand version of a trade agreement between Britain and America, that covered about two dozen aspects of trade. It is by no me comprehensive, and we are certain it will lead to further friction.

I looked at my friend in disbelief, he continued by saying, there’s no way the government can have a trade agreement in 90 days, the fastest I ever saw, he said, was about nine months, it was done between Japan and the United States, and basically in Japan said yes to everything. Despite Japan’s total compliance, it still took nine months. In addition, there’s really no one to talk to in the US government, They have secretaries and under secretaries, but the bench is very shallow, the technicians are all gone and have not been replaced.

So what does that mean, I asked? It means, that sooner rather than later, Britain will be in a trade war with America again, because The administration does not understand what they agreed to. And no one is willing to explain it to them.

he then continued, and said look at the Europeans, they try to sit down for serious trade, talks with their counterparts in the US, and there was no one around. Phones were not answered. Emails were not opened. There’s no one on the other side to talk to. He continued, it’s the reality of administration which is 100% govern by the last 15 minutes of the presidents thoughts. In his mind, he cannot conceived that conversation can last for more than an hour. He thinks that the trade relationship between Europe and America is like discussing the supply of Toilet bowls in one of his Las Vegas hotels.

What my friend was saying, over our many drinks, was that trade war between America and the rest of the world was a certainty going forward. In large part, it explains the weakness of the US dollar. People, governments, are shoring up their defences. Getting ready for the obvious outcome. There’s a reason Brussel has been talking about a new trading order that excludes America. It’s not that people don’t want to trade with America, but it’s perceived as flighty and unreliable. Therefore, it cannot be a core partner. 

aside from that, it was a great evening. But it was a cautionary tale, for the first six months of the Trump administration are just the beginning of the chaos. We can expect over the next 3 1/2 years.. The reality is that the US government, or rather Donald Trump, are trying to change the world order in increments of 90 days. No one inside the administration is able to tell the man, that things take more than 90 days.

Trump idea that everything can be resolved by the application of new tariffs is faulty, but no one will tell him. Because no one inside administration will talk to power, because they have been selected specifically because they have drunk the Kool-Aid.

The inclusion in this big beautiful bill, that Donald Trump sign on Friday, of provisions to impose additional withholding taxes, on dividends and interest, is proof , that no one is able to tell the administration, that trying to tax people who are trying to convince to lend to you is just a stupid idea.

Interesting times, as the Chinese would say

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...