Skip to main content

Canadian Federal Elections in five weeks?

Last night the Conservative federal government presented its annual budget, it was not really an austerity program.  The 2010/11 federal government deficit is pegged at $40 billion, while the 2011/12 is $29 billion. There was one massive change, the minister of finance announce that many tax loopholes would be closed generating additional revenues of $3/4 billion per annum.  It was widely anticipated that the Conservatives would try to buy-off the NDP (Canada's "far left" party -- which puts them at the right of the U.S. Democratic party) but it turns out that there was not enough  "give aways".

The other segment where the government has been generous was in the accelerated depreciation for capital assets -- which is a good idea insofar as the CAD is so strong (and going stronger according to virtually everyone) that capital expenditure on plan and equipment is essential -- in fact the National Bank of Canada wrote a sensational piece on the productivity of Canada's manufacturing sector -- well worth a read.

Bottom line we were going to have election within the next 12 months (there has to be election after every 4 parliamentary session -- 'tis the law of the land), the Conservative government has been running "How good we are" adds for the past three months, since no one wants election in the summer, or risk the autumn (this is Canada -- snow storms are always around the corner!) late April or early May 2011 were seen that the optimal time to have elections, by all involved.

In fact, the only party that could cause problem with this picture is the Block Quebecois -- they have not shined much over the past few months (oblivion is more like it) and they may enjoy screwing with everyone's time table (they are the only party that has no pretension to power!).

N.B.  Election would normally take place 5 weeks after the vote of no confidence.  This has yet to be scheduled and there are some procedures which relate to the budget debate (if such debate does occur)

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...