Skip to main content

F35 to buy or not to buy

Canada is in the process of replacing its aging CF18 (already 30 years old) fighter aircraft.  Canada is a both a small and a large country, its geography is large, but its 36 million population is small.  The decision to replace the aging CF18 has been long and arduous, and the Department of Defense has finally settled on the F35 strike aircraft, currently being tested and readied for deployment (2016) in the US Air Force.

So far the DoD has indicated that the aircraft should cost about $75 million a piece and we are looking to buy 65 – for a total of nearly $5 billion.  On top of that the DoD has budgeted for the aircraft consumable and training facilities – basically another $4 billion. For a grand total of $9 billion. 

Those who want to buy the aircraft maintain that it was specifically created as a replacement for the F18 aircraft (the American version of the CF18), and therefore an excellent and affordable aircraft for the Canadian armed forces.  It also a dual mission aircraft, it is both a fighter and a bomber.  As those involved indicated, when the CF18 was bought it was purchased in the cold war environment where our enemies would be flying over the Pole!  The aircraft will be used by the US army, which means that in war theater Canadians (who often work in concert with the Americans) will have access to spare parts….

Those who are against the purchase have three principal issues:  First, the aircraft is not yet “operating”, it has been flying for a year but is still in the test phase.  So the final cost of the aircraft is unknown.  However, the cost per aircraft will not be $75 million, but nearly twice that $145 million per aircraft.  Which means that the total program cost is not $9 billion but nearer to $16 billion.

Second, although it is a replacement aircraft for the F18, it has two major flaws – it’s a compromise aircraft, as a fighter and a bomber it is great at neither.  Third, two key features are missing, long range and super cruse.  Canada is a big country and military aircrafts are the F1 of the air, they consume lots of gas, and have limited range.  Moreover, if the aircraft doesn’t have super cruise it must use its afterburners – great speed, but range drops off dramatically.

The first and second arguments are the poorest, firstly, the numbers given by the DoD are preliminary, Canada will not embark on this adventure until it knows the final number.  In fact, the aircraft may indeed cost $16 billion but that’s not a reason for not buying them.  One aspect that is somewhat strange in the cost calculation: Wikipedia shows the estimated flyaway cost of the aircraft (in all its versions) at $140-$150 million per aircraft (that the DoD talks about $75 million per aircraft seems to be an exercise in deception on their part).  Those who say that we should not buy fighter jets misunderstand the discussion.  If Canada is to have borders (especially in the North) it must enforce its sovereign rights.  Fighter aircrafts are a wonderful force projection tool.  The second argument that the aircraft is bad at its two missions is valid but irrelevant; Canada cannot afford to have both a fighter and a bomber.  It needs a fighter for force projection, and it needs a bomber for flight interdiction missions (e.g. Libya).  Canada needs a multi-mission aircraft. 

The one aspect that is troubling is the last one, specifically; Canada’s primary use for the aircraft is force projection.  Most of this will take place over the high artic – very far from bases, so the aircraft need long range operation capability (unless the DoD is also planning to buy a bunch of refueling aircraft).  Finally, the F35 is a single engine aircraft.  That’s a bit of a problem when flying in the artic. 

In terms of competitors to the F35 there is the F22 and the European Typhoon.  The F22 cannot be exported.  The Eurofighter Typhoon is also a twin engine super cruse high range aircraft, but by 2020 (when we are looking to replace the CF18) it will be an old program.  There are good arguments why the Typhoon is not appropriate, because by the time Canada is ready to replace the CF18 (around 2020) the aircraft will already be “old” at 17, and nearing the end of its production schedule.  Maybe the DoD bought the only “available” modern Fighter aircraft available!

Anyway these are the facts 

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more