Skip to main content

Oil at $200

The story right now is that the “war” premium – caused by Middle Eastern instability is around $30; oil should be priced around $80 -- $90/bbl, instead of the $125/$110 we are seeing in the Brent and WTI markets. One of my favorite bloggist is EarlyWarning which discuses a range of issues but seems to have built a very interesting side business in looking at the Middle Eastern oil production market.

Readers will remember my commentary a few days ago that the Saudi oil minister had indicated that because of glut the Kingdom was reducing production from 9 million to 8.5 million bbl/day.  

 (Source:  Early Warning)

Early Warning looking at some third party data noted a number of interesting facts:  Rig count which had been declining for years has been rising in the past quarter.  Halliburton, one of the companies involved in drilling in the Kingdom indicated that most of the rigs were being deployed on older fields (that’s how you increase production), but also that long dormant projects were being re-activated.  Early this week the same oil minister indicated that it was unlikely that the Kingdom could increase production beyond its peak 9.5 million/bbl/day within the next five years.

Now if you read the Early Warning blog you would get all that, and since he’s a better writer than me… My focus remains Canada, with it ever increasing production of oils ands (the new production doesn’t involve tailing ponds), and the impact on North American energy security.  The Americas are in a position to be independent from the Middle East with regards to energy supply (prices are another issue), with Brazil’s new giant discovery (which make some of the current deep ocean drilling look like child’s play), Mexico (if they can get their act together and begin re-investing) and Venezuela (Chavez is not immortal) and Canada there is scope for energy security.  

The price side of the equation is something else, if it is true that Saudi Arabia will not be able to increase production beyond 9.5 MM/bbd/day until 2017, there is a major piece of the “assumed” production segment missing – because this has always been the bet, that despite demand/supply balance, there was always the perception that the Kingdom could increase production in a pinch, being the swing producer to keep the balance between supply and demand in place.  However, this is not the case, demand for oil is certain to keep on rising from BRIC countries as their economies are economies are on fire, in the case of China the current drought (one of the most severe) and coal shortage will force the country to import more oil (despite the treat of rolling blackouts).

Even if America slows down – gas price is now above $4 a gallon --- and expected to reach $5 during the peak driving season, the reality is that high (and even higher) oil prices are her to stay, because the supply side of the oil equation is no nearly as clear cut (and simple) as many analysts would like people to believe.  

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more