Skip to main content

Credit Swiss statement on European banks -- That's very serious!

I started writing about the US presidential debate this morning, 48 hours after the event to be able to have some clear thinking:  Its easy, Clinton won, she was prepared and Trump showed us that he remains the "winging kind of guy"  but he did not confirm the reason for not giving his tax returns -- he doesn't pay federal income taxes.

What is much more serious is what's going down in Europe with the banks.  Slightly over a year ago Tidjan Tiam became the CEO of Credit Swiss, a good-ish financial institution that actually has enough capital.  His statement:
“You get extreme movements on the basis of relatively minor piece of news because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” he said, citing “regulatory uncertainty” about future capital requirements and concerns about “potential fines like you’ve seen on Deutsche Bank this week”.
 “I think there is also a lot of doubt, a fundamental doubt, is there a viable business model that covers its cost of equity?” Mr Thiam added.
 “That’s the big big big question,” he said, describing it as something that “makes banks not really investable as a sector”. 
Deutsche Bank is an old institution, a great institution and I really wish them well, I hope that they come out of their current predicament”.
These are the statement that one of Europe's premier bank is making about DB in particular but also of the entire banking network.  His view is that Europe's banks are seriously undercapitalizes since they can hardly absorbe the hits from regulatory fines.  It also explains the sudden withdrawal of many new issues.  The woes of the European banking system yields are spreading and the issuers are not ready to absorbe the increased price (or they are rethinking their current pricing strategy).  Of course this was all at 5 am, by 1 pm, the markets were all up and the end of the world had once again been postponed. is however a real issue here;  rumors are that the several prime banks will be coming to the market for more capital, because although the business of CLO/CDO is pushing assets out of the door as fast as possible, the totals are not nearly substantial enough for them to meet their Basel III requirements.

I am guessing some long dated sub debt expensively priced that has an impact on the whole market spread, the whole market will be repriced; everyone prices their issues off the best risks and not the worse. There is a perception that German banks (including the Landesbank) have some serious undercapitalization issues  that need to be resolved ASAP-- they ALL thought they could ignore Basel III but it turns out that this may not be the case, as banks in the rest of the world have for the past 4 years been strengthening their balance sheet, and resent the Europeans trying to finess their way out of trouble.  BTW we are not even discussing Italy here -- its the core, its Germany and its France...

Anyway, its Wednesday and the world keeps on turning

Note:  No position on CS or DB

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...