Skip to main content

Still no $%& inflation

The Bank of Canada has a thing for inflation.  For years the BoC has had a 1.5% to 2.5% inflation target.  A necessary lubricant to a growing economy, and yet prices are just not cooperating.  Inflation has been rising recently to near the lower target of 1.5%, but every time we get close inflation disappears again.


(Source:  Statistics Canada)


The CPI is a measure (warts and all) of the consumer costs, another is the Industrial Production and Raw Material which also shows limited movement (at least until early 2004)


The problem that virtually all that price increase was caused by energy costs that have soared following the "continuing disagreements" in the Ukraine.  Bottom line oil prices rose from around $90/bbl to $106/bbl -- a 17% increase in 4 months.  So really no help there because everything else is not doing much at all.

What is the BoC to do?  Well the foreign exchange markets have already decided that the era of interest rate tightening is already over, and in fact in full reverse-- just look at the mortgage rates on offer from Canadian banks -- bottom line the BoC's interest rate normalization project is dead in the water, back to the rest of the world where zero interest rate policy (with all its risks) is back on.

For foreign investors the news is good -- after all Canada is still a resource rich country, with a reasonable debt position (when compared to the other guys) and where a relatively homogenous population ensures that no armed insurrection will occur (unless you count the occasional snow ball fight).  Overall, the BoC is back at square one -- the same place it was 18 months ago, except that for all its effort the CAD has dropped by about 10% (maybe that was the objective...).

The policy tools available to central banks are narrower than they were 10 years ago.  Changing demographics is a key issue here; an ageing population may not react the same way as a young one when rates change -- they are rate givers (net savings) and not rate takers (young indebted families).

The challenges for Canada are as follows:


  1. Despite near full employment workers don't have much bargaining power for wage increases
  2. Inflation, despite massive growth in money supply (insert definition here), is not occurring
  3. Canada is far more open than it was 20 years ago, the tools the BoC has grown up with are no longer effective -- a corporation that sells its goods in US dollars will match its borrowing requirements to reduce the currency risk impact using natural hedges.  This corporation is not impacted by the BoC
  4. Canadian banks are bigger today and better capitalized -- there BoC has only moral suasion (which failed recently when Canadian banks reduced prime mortgage rates despite the wishes of the BoC)
  5. New tools are required and maybe new measures of inflation too -- although StatCan is a specialist in terminating data series
Fundamentally, OECD economies are finding that population shift are impacting economic management tools -- if you think its bad here, imagine China -- where the one child policy implemented in 1979 is now "coming home to roost" with a dramatic drop in the growth of the labour pool.  Try managing that problem when Chinese companies will have to fight for new employees... What is being seen in a rather massive way in China is seen in a milder format here in the OECD.  Economists have yet to figure out what economic tools can be used to influence the economy.

Finally, on inflation and the various index we look at:  In America the price of a Big Mac has risen by 5.8% per annum over the past 10 years -- between 2004 and 2004.  Now that's not scientific.  A house in Montreal in in 2005 is now 50% more expensive than it was then -- that too is part of inflation -- unless you never moved, which statistically is wrong since 40% of Canadian move every 5 years.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…