Skip to main content

Greece Euro 3 billion 5y 4.95% first new bond offering

Greece has sold out its first bond offering a Euro 3 billion priced at 4.95% (coupon) and issued at par. The issue was three times oversubscribed.

Greek unemployment continues to rise -- 27% as of the end of January 2014, with youth unemployment around 58% -- although stats are unreliable because so many in the public service have been fired!

How can the financial market see Greece as an acceptable risk?  The kind of social dislocation we are seeing there is well outside the norm.  Certain parties that are running for office are downright scary (SYRIZA and New Dawn), how can investors make the calculation that this is a good buy?

There are three aspects (at least) that govern bond purchases.  The price (yield) the term and the size. This first Greek bond in many years is certain to become a benchmark offering.  Because it is the first, it will be a benchmark, it will stay "on the run" longer than it normally would -- that means that its offered for sale or purchase by a number of brokers with an attractive bid/offer spread in relatively large chunks.  Anyway, bond buyers have a very short investment horizon; they buy long dated instruments but that are extremely liquid.  In this case, the yield is OK (about 300 bps above the US T-bill rate), and if the expected deflation train doesn't come calling the impact on this bond price will be small because of its short duration.

My guess is that with all the hell that is about to break out in Greece over the next 12 months, (and in Europe too if you believe all the talks of deflation) then buying this bond makes sense. What is happening in the real world is rather appalling and is a real indictment of the European system. Greek politicians have signed a deal with the devil -- they are willing to subject their citizenry to the worse possible hardship so that they can stay in the club, they just want the party to continue a little bit longer.



I love this graph, because it was produced by Europe and it shows a bright future... in fact the grey area is projections based on the ability of the government to generate a surplus.  In reality, Greek 2013 GDP growth was -2.3% and total government deficit is accelerating -- at -12% in 2013 down from -9% in 2012.  Yesterday, the Greek government announced that its 2013 deficit was actually only 2.9% -- if you exclude certain "one off items".  In the same news conference Greek sovereign debt was announced to be Euro 175 billion up from Euro 157 billion in 2012, an 11% increase.  Combining the increased government deficit, the increased debt burden and the contracting GDP and you have an explosive mix.  The ultimate proof that the only driver here is to keep the party going until the Germans say "enough".  Again that is not the most important table.  The fact that the Greek economy continues to contract -- hence its ability to repay its obligations is further reduced:



Here again, the numbers are to the end of 2013.


So what was the asset allocator decision tree:  First he's got to buy some OECD bonds, and he's looking for yield.  He's likely to be European -- Americans have not had a huge appetite for Euro denominated bonds because of the fear that the Euro is a one way bet...eventually.  So he's looking for countries that will be bailed out, and Greece is an easy call.  The Spanish and Portuguese economies are nearly too big to be support by the ECB, but Greece is easy, plus they've been following the program to hell, so for the asset allocator its an easy call:

  1. Europe centric 
  2. Yield is good
  3. Put option to ECB if Greece turns to shit
  4. Maturity is good at 5 years
  5. Liquide


That's how you get a 3x oversubscribed bond! 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more