Skip to main content

Still no $%& inflation

The Bank of Canada has a thing for inflation.  For years the BoC has had a 1.5% to 2.5% inflation target.  A necessary lubricant to a growing economy, and yet prices are just not cooperating.  Inflation has been rising recently to near the lower target of 1.5%, but every time we get close inflation disappears again.


(Source:  Statistics Canada)


The CPI is a measure (warts and all) of the consumer costs, another is the Industrial Production and Raw Material which also shows limited movement (at least until early 2004)


The problem that virtually all that price increase was caused by energy costs that have soared following the "continuing disagreements" in the Ukraine.  Bottom line oil prices rose from around $90/bbl to $106/bbl -- a 17% increase in 4 months.  So really no help there because everything else is not doing much at all.

What is the BoC to do?  Well the foreign exchange markets have already decided that the era of interest rate tightening is already over, and in fact in full reverse-- just look at the mortgage rates on offer from Canadian banks -- bottom line the BoC's interest rate normalization project is dead in the water, back to the rest of the world where zero interest rate policy (with all its risks) is back on.

For foreign investors the news is good -- after all Canada is still a resource rich country, with a reasonable debt position (when compared to the other guys) and where a relatively homogenous population ensures that no armed insurrection will occur (unless you count the occasional snow ball fight).  Overall, the BoC is back at square one -- the same place it was 18 months ago, except that for all its effort the CAD has dropped by about 10% (maybe that was the objective...).

The policy tools available to central banks are narrower than they were 10 years ago.  Changing demographics is a key issue here; an ageing population may not react the same way as a young one when rates change -- they are rate givers (net savings) and not rate takers (young indebted families).

The challenges for Canada are as follows:


  1. Despite near full employment workers don't have much bargaining power for wage increases
  2. Inflation, despite massive growth in money supply (insert definition here), is not occurring
  3. Canada is far more open than it was 20 years ago, the tools the BoC has grown up with are no longer effective -- a corporation that sells its goods in US dollars will match its borrowing requirements to reduce the currency risk impact using natural hedges.  This corporation is not impacted by the BoC
  4. Canadian banks are bigger today and better capitalized -- there BoC has only moral suasion (which failed recently when Canadian banks reduced prime mortgage rates despite the wishes of the BoC)
  5. New tools are required and maybe new measures of inflation too -- although StatCan is a specialist in terminating data series
Fundamentally, OECD economies are finding that population shift are impacting economic management tools -- if you think its bad here, imagine China -- where the one child policy implemented in 1979 is now "coming home to roost" with a dramatic drop in the growth of the labour pool.  Try managing that problem when Chinese companies will have to fight for new employees... What is being seen in a rather massive way in China is seen in a milder format here in the OECD.  Economists have yet to figure out what economic tools can be used to influence the economy.

Finally, on inflation and the various index we look at:  In America the price of a Big Mac has risen by 5.8% per annum over the past 10 years -- between 2004 and 2004.  Now that's not scientific.  A house in Montreal in in 2005 is now 50% more expensive than it was then -- that too is part of inflation -- unless you never moved, which statistically is wrong since 40% of Canadian move every 5 years.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...