Skip to main content

Markets and OCLS musing

Today there are exactly two markets that are down:  China and Taiwan; the rest are all up! Today is an upday, why I don't know -- could it be that inflation in Portugal is higher than anticipated, could it be that...really my point is that I don't know (call your broker he doesn't know either).  There is no rhyme or  logic to short term capital market movements -- that's why momentum traders did so well (at least until the high frequency traders got into the action), because there's inertia in the short term market movements.

My March favorite trade was Oculus Innovative Sciences (NASDAQ:OCLS) that was up 40% on the 14th of March.  On the 21th of March Facebook announced the acquisition of Oculus 3D a private company. I am certain dear reader than you can do simple math -- 14 is before 21, so a small med tech co with a market cap of USD 30 million saw massive trades a week prior (and a price increase of 40%) to Mark's making  an acquisition announcement of Oculus 3D -- can you say" insider trading".  OCLS was a stock with virtually no trading presence (10,000 share a day was a good day) on the 14th two blocks of 2 million and 2.5 million were traded (and several smaller traders occurred too later in the day -- maybe the unwind of a stupid position...).  Considering they bough the wrong company does this constitute insider trading?  This is not the first time that what appears to be "insider trading" hits the wrong company.  It happened a year ago, in this case the error is strange since OCLS is a medical device Co.  Anyway, don't know if the SEC will investigate.

On the longer side of the equation things are looking difficult; king Copper is off its high, rumours are that no steel plant in China is even breaking even -- Hong Kong real estate investors are bitching about the price reduction (they never complain when the market is up), and overall there is a general malaise in the market (despite being up for the day).  The reality is that long term investments in the capital market generates a half decent yield -- taking in consideration dividends (about 2% per annum) the market generates about 5% capital gain per annum -- taking arbitrary dates (Jan1, 2001),  It you employ a simple trading rules:  selling the downmarket and buying as soon as there is an upswing (about 7% per annum) -- the difference between 70% gain and 110% gain over 15 years is relatively small annual increase.

Anyway, market are up today -- Friday the 28th.  The economies of the OECD are not doing great (Q4/2013 was good for the US but poor for the rest: Europe was at 0.5% and Canada at 0.7%) -- obviously the raw material game has gone sideways (sic Copper), there are tension that need to be resolve (Europe's debt issue, China's over reliance on investments for growth and Russia's expansionist behaviour of late).  But again because there are massive problems it doesn't mean that these thing will be reflected in short term market movements!

(no position in OCLS or Facebook)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...