Skip to main content

Will Trump start a trade war?

President Trump has been in office for 48 hours now and so far we have seen the following:


  1. Plans massive tariffs on imports (especially if the White House "believes" that the jobs were stolen")
  2. Reduce regulation by 75%
  3. Shut down PBS -- that was Saturday and I've not seen anything more about that since

Aside from the weekend fight over the number of attendants at the inauguration, and I mean the entire weekend. When it was obvious from photograph that the thing was poorly attended.  The reality is that a large number of people would go to Washington for the "show" and Trump didn't deliver (there were no A or B list stars at his show ) so what's the point!

Once the images were out there was little doubt that it was fewer than Obama in '08.  So fine, let it be! BUT if this is all it takes to take Team Trump off its message (of a new administration) they will get bogged down quickly.  The idea that massive tariffs will be a huge win for Americans is hard to swallow -- after all its American who will pay more for their iPhones and tablets.

The shutting down of PBS (which cost US$ 445 million per annum), seems to be aiming for the wrong objective when you say you want to cut the massive government expenses of 3.8 trillion -- $445 million is equal to 0.002% of the federal government's annual expenses about the same as Planned Parenthood -- these cuts are about perception and not reality.

If the US government imposes huge tariffs on imports (which it is free to do) it will also have to leave the World Trade organization -- as that institution has set limits to punitive damages.  It is hard to say if that is Team Trump's objective, but since he's made no bones about leaving NATO (to Putin's joy) that too can be a goner.

The question is what is the impact of a trade war with China, Mexico and Canada?  That's the real key here.  Two facts are certain, inflation will increase in the US as prices rise to accommodate these rising costs.  The long term is harder to figure out.

There's a lot of goodwill that about to leave the negotiations.  If I were Canada I would look to other markets to buy goods.  In effect, Canada and Mexico have close their borders to other nations favoring the US (and each other) it would be easy for these situations to change -- Air conditioners from China or Korea could be given favorable treatment (or at least remove duties), other duties that have protected north American manufacturers could also be reconsidered.

Attacking the US policy directly will never work, instead stealth is called for instead.  It doesn't penalize your customers (and voters) while impacting manufacturers of the country seeking to impose duties -- by making other goods cheaper, and hence more attractive



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...