Skip to main content

Cars, the future is today

more than 4 years ago during a long walk between Burgos and Santiago de Compostela a conversation took place between my father and me.  The topic was the likely advent of autonomous vehicles.  I told my father that the first self-driving car would emerge in 5 years, my father thought that 10 years was a minimum!  Imagine our surprise as we walked out “of the woods” that Tesla had just announced the launch of its first "level 2" self-driving car — which still means substantial supervision by the driver.

Last week the LAPD arrested a man in his Tesla 3 who was fast asleep at the wheel of his car.  Again a very dangerous situation since the level 3 technology still require substantial driver supervision.

Then again this morning Waymo announced that it is launching, in Phoenix for nearly public use, its autonomous taxi; and that if everything goes according to plan, the fleet of autonomous taxis will be available for use by the general public early in 2019.

This is the revolution; because autonomous taxi are the gateway to autonomous cars everywhere (taxi generally work in the city).  If you think the GM restructuring was a big thing, or that the soon to be announced Ford restructuring (they took the provisions but have not announced what would be shut down), the implication is that the demand for vehicles is about to drop dramatically.

First to go will be the second car, used to either go to the office (or the nearby mass transit station), granted in the city it will not change much, but autonomous cars spell the end of parking garages in places like Manhattan.  Then how long till the "ownership" of a car become thing of the past? 

Most commuters drive between 40 and 75 minutes every day.  The rest of the day the car is parked unused.  How about repurposing such vehicle so that they are used maybe another 3-4 hours a day.  The implication is that the number of vehicle required in the US could drop from -- 40% to 80% (in the worse case scenario).

That means that car manufacturing plants (there are already far too many) could see a dramatic reducing in overall usage.  We are talking million of jobs here.

This has the potential for being a major shift in consumer paterns --


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more