Skip to main content

airline business: Yesterday I was told that I was an idiot!

Yesterday, an acquaintance called to point out that I was an idiot if I thought that solving the airline business problems was as simple as I made it to be!  I pointed out that this was not a "how to list" but provide to the layperson a sufficient understanding of the industry's complexity, and how different players made different decisions based on valid concerns and realities, that applied to their situation -- Singapore airline decision process is very different than that of American airlines!

So he no longer thinks I'm an idiot, just a "higher functioning moron"  I call that an improvement!

However, my ex-friend (he was really really really upset) did make one massive error (and that's where things got ugly) he was sure that the older aircraft would come out of retirement.  I spoke with some acquaintance at ILFC (Now AerCap -- not so sexy a name) he said that out of the 1,000 aircraft they expected maybe 50 not to return to service --- ever (these usually will not be owned aircraft but managed aircraft on behalf of third parties).  The point I am making is that they've got a very modern fleet (avg 6.0 years), some lessors have really ancient (like 15-year-old aircraft).

My ex-friend disagreed and said that too much capital was invested in these aircraft to be written-off, I told him there are two issues; the cost of bringing an aircraft back -- and the potential income it could generate.  In 2018 I was looking to start a small airline in Mexico -- very dedicated routes (thank God it didn't work out -- we would be broke now), but we could get EMB145 for virtually nothing (the lease rate for these aircraft should be around $250,000 per month -- we could get them for a 10th of that!!!

The owners were simply keeping the aircraft flying in the event that demand for the type ever came back (that may even be a bet that pays off since demand for smaller aircraft is rising), also kudos to Airbus for buying the C-series from Bombardier.

So I believe that the cost (and time) to bring these old aircraft back is not worth the effort (especially bigger aircraft like the A330, early models) the B747 is probably a goner as is the A380 -- it is hard to imagine that capacity demand will resume to what it was in 2019.  again I could be wrong -- the deal I could get with the EMB145 is probably unavailable now!  because there is a scramble towards smaller aircraft.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...