Skip to main content

Updated 2: Was Robinhood right in reducing the ability of its clients to purchase Gamestop shares?

The only reason that counts:  Robinhood ran out of collateral for GME and AMC and other high vol names.  Those who bitch about this just don't understand how markets operate (or care for that matter)

First principle:  Wall street, like the casino of Vegas, never loses!

Second Principle:  Pigs always end at the slaughter

Looking at Gamestop (GME) you know it's a bubble, trend following this kind of volatility (750%) tells you the stock can go to zero as it can go to $900.  Fundamental of the company at $10.00 showed the company possibly undervalued but a price of $360.  Well, that's just a mania.

A few months ago, Hertz (which was in chapter 11) tried to do a new share issue -- prior to the reorg.  You knew that ANY investor that bought these shares (maybe cheap) was 100% certain of getting wiped-out.  The SEC shut it down despite a huge appetite for the issuance.

What is also important is that the daily traded volume of the shares is equal to the float (shares not owned by insiders). Insiders have been selling (at around $30/40 range) for the past year.

Michael Burry (of the Big Short fame) has been a fan of the stock since 2019 -- he was far more famous on wall street for a value picker -- that's how he got money for GS, and that he was a deeply analytical guy.  

People who trade on Robinhood are not that!  They have little idea of Volatility, p/e, and the risk of trend following.  The reality is that Robinhood took the view that if its client's trade went "south" they would sue Robinhood.  So Robinhood made it hard for its client to trade (probably buy) the shares of AMC and GME.

Finally, the reason Robinhood had to reduce trades was a good one; the rise in Vol and the settlement for GME and AMC of T+2 creates a huge liability for Robinhood in terms of collateral they have to post.  Hence the 600 MM.  BTW everyone did the same thing for the same reason.

More news, last week, Robinhood got a call for collateral of US$ 3 billion -- up from US$ 30 million.  Eventually, Robinhood was able to reduce the call to $600 million.  Still, Robinhood had to borrow that from somewhere (it turns out the banks were happy to oblige, as were its shareholders).

This morning, Robinhood is down 25% to $246.  That's got a hurt those who bought it at $350...

UPDATE:  Turns out Robinhood is even more of a "shitshow"  obviously the firm was not ready for the business volume that the GME and other short squeeze generated - its back office is "inadequate" for the volume of clients and the volume of business.  But get this Robinhood was selling its order flow to Citadel...basically one of the biggest hedge funds knew where the little people were doing!  Now a this is very nice, the truth is that the whole game was caused by the options market's gamma squeeze.  So at the end of the day, Robinhood was a "sideshow"  Still








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process
Post a Comment
Read more

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki
Post a Comment
Read more

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu
Post a Comment
Read more