Skip to main content

Non-Economic rant: Tom Flanagan and his Fatwa against Julian Assange


Tom Flanagan is was a senior advisor to Stephen Harper Canada's Prime Minister.  On Monday, he joined Aytollah Khomeini (against Salman Rushdie for his book) in proclaiming a "Fatwa" against Julian Assange (the Wikileak guy), and that he should be killed.

is words were:  
I think Assange should be assassinated, actually," Flanagan said with a laugh, and when asked to expand upon his answer, added that he "wouldn't be unhappy" if Assange "disappeared."
When the CBC's Solomon commented that his position was "pretty harsh stuff," Flanagan, who is known for his off-the-cuff sense of humour and often brings props to panel interviews, replied: "I'm feeling very manly today, Evan."
   (Source: here) 


Now Flanagan is part of Harper's inner circle, originally from the University of Calgary (don't laugh it’s actually a good school).  This guy has been professor of political science since 1968, so the man knows "what is what", and yet he went on national TV and said something so incredibly stupid and unwarranted, that it begs the question: Is this guy for real?

There are a few issues here: First, Wikileaks revelations are mostly embarrassing, the kind of High School bitchy gossip comments about all kind of worldly politicians.  Second, Assange has probably not broken any laws, contrary to what some believed, Assange did not commit treason, since he's not American he owes no allegiance to America!

What it does expose is a streak among certain politicians to deal with dissent in a way that is at the extreme opposite of our democracies are about.  Mr. Flanagan's comments would be acceptable in a repressive regime, but here this is not the case. 

The most charitable way of looking at this incident is that he’s an out of touch angry old man.  Less charitable is that is the kind of guy who shoots the messenger!







Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...