Skip to main content

Non-Economic rant: Tom Flanagan and his Fatwa against Julian Assange


Tom Flanagan is was a senior advisor to Stephen Harper Canada's Prime Minister.  On Monday, he joined Aytollah Khomeini (against Salman Rushdie for his book) in proclaiming a "Fatwa" against Julian Assange (the Wikileak guy), and that he should be killed.

is words were:  
I think Assange should be assassinated, actually," Flanagan said with a laugh, and when asked to expand upon his answer, added that he "wouldn't be unhappy" if Assange "disappeared."
When the CBC's Solomon commented that his position was "pretty harsh stuff," Flanagan, who is known for his off-the-cuff sense of humour and often brings props to panel interviews, replied: "I'm feeling very manly today, Evan."
   (Source: here) 


Now Flanagan is part of Harper's inner circle, originally from the University of Calgary (don't laugh it’s actually a good school).  This guy has been professor of political science since 1968, so the man knows "what is what", and yet he went on national TV and said something so incredibly stupid and unwarranted, that it begs the question: Is this guy for real?

There are a few issues here: First, Wikileaks revelations are mostly embarrassing, the kind of High School bitchy gossip comments about all kind of worldly politicians.  Second, Assange has probably not broken any laws, contrary to what some believed, Assange did not commit treason, since he's not American he owes no allegiance to America!

What it does expose is a streak among certain politicians to deal with dissent in a way that is at the extreme opposite of our democracies are about.  Mr. Flanagan's comments would be acceptable in a repressive regime, but here this is not the case. 

The most charitable way of looking at this incident is that he’s an out of touch angry old man.  Less charitable is that is the kind of guy who shoots the messenger!







Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will slap them with no-fly status. Update;  It seems that what they threw on the airc

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki