Skip to main content

Surprise! 93% of market economist believe that BoC will keep interest rates unchanged next week

Not making this up, Canada's respectable Financial Post wrote an article that indicated that 93% of market economist "believed" that interest rates were going to remain at 1% next week when the board of the Bank of Canada meets. 

Part of the problem is that the article is about Canada's "economist" when the journalist really doesn't address the fundamental problem for Canada next week:  Weak 3rd quarter GDP numbers, with negative GDP growth in September, and very high producer price inflation.

What could have been interesting is th discuss the dilemma faced by the BoC; price stability is core to its mission (BoC is not independent from the Canadian government's policy -- as the latter can overrule the decision of the bank), and there are serious worries there.   Service inflation is substantially above the core target, and has been for some time, the core CPI is on the 2% threshold,  but CPI (including food & energy) is above that 2% target. It is widely assumed that there will be some feed trough of producer prices, and these are very high at more than 5.8%

The writer's only saving grace was to mention that the BoC would probably refrain from raising interest rate until early 2011 -- but then, it's more than obvious since that would coincide with the BoC's next board meeting.  the failure here is to make the readers believe that Canada's "market economist" have some kind of magic 8-ball available to tell them the actions the BoC will take. Sloppy journalism, on an important topic.  Although I guess that if you are uncomfortable with your subject -- interest rate policy, talking about what other people believe is the easiest.  

My take on interest rates:  The BoC is waiting period derived from the main economic indicators:  
  1. The BoC will be glad that industry is investing heavily in plant and equipment, and indication that Canadian companies are taking the CAD/USD parity issue seriously, and not as a temporary issue (should lead to improved productivity).
  2. Energy & food inflation are peripheral issue for the BoC, with a perception that we are nearly done, and that it will have limited impact on the economy (some of the increase in price will be absorbed by a stronger dollar -- which is deflationary)
  3. Housing is set for a correction, especially if the Asian slow down is for real -- this could provide the BoC's with some support (but this outcome is the opposite of higher energy price risk).
  4. Canada's economy is slowing much more quickly than the BoC had "anticipated" earlier this year.  However, most of this slow down has been caused by external factors (exports) over which Canada has no control.  The BoC's fear there will be that higher interest rate will put additional burden on Canada's economy (although everyone recognizes that current interest rates are very accommodative).
Certain of these factor cancel each other out.  But for Canada, as a very open economy, the BoC will be looking at external factors.  Should the much discussed Asian recession fail to materialize, then the BoC will consider raising rates by 25-50 bps over the next 6/9 months.  

Note that if U.S. interest remain at the current 0.25% and Canadian rates go above 1.25%, this would be the largest EVER interest rate differential between Canada and the US -- such differential has huge implications for Canada. 







Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more