Skip to main content

Technical note on ETFs



I’ve often said that I am a terrible stock picker.  I don’t believe in stock picking, for every good pick there is the equivalent terrible selection.  What makes a good stock trader is not his ability to pick winners, but to have the guts to “cut-out” the losers quickly, and I am crap at that part of the equation!

Anyway, my favorite stock investment instruments are ETF – Exchange Traded Funds that allow me to take position in virtually any global strategy (did very well for a while investing in Taiwanese stocks as a proxy for China).  Funny enough the first ever ETFs were invented in Canada – really, but the real big ones are the QQQQ, spiders etc that provide access to some of the biggest stock plays in the world (in the case of the above two:  Nasdaq top 100 stocks and the S&P500).  The reason I like ETFs is that since I am a terrible stock picker (alpha) the way I make money in the stock market is following the trend of the market in general (beta).  The other attractive feature of ETF is that they are easy to buy have very lower management fees (most) and brokerage fees are minimal as they can easily be bought using a discount brokerage account.

Anyway, being somewhat involved in the financial market I kind of know how ETFs are made, especially I know how they are made in Canada – most of the ETFs are made by the book runner buying and selling the underlying stocks – that way the ETF tracks the index (more or less).  However, to reduce the tracking errors (because different stocks have different volatility coefficients -- it gets complicated here) derivatives are used here.  That way if you buy the ETF for the S&P/TSX 60 your tracking error may be as small as 25/35 bps (1/3 of 1%).  However, in Canada there are liquidity issues (Canada is a small market) about 10-12% of any specific ETF assets will be derivatives (instead of the underlying stock).  In the U.S. where liquidity is much higher (and we are talking orders of magnitude here!) maybe 5% of each ETF is made up of derivatives – and for the really big ones (QQQQ & SPY) it is probably lower (less then 1%).

In Europe the proportion of derivatives is much higher.  Primarily for fiscal efficiency it is efficient to use derivatives instead of the underlying equities; as much as 50% of the average ETF is made up of derivatives.  The issue with derivatives is counterparty credit risk.  Not only is there a risk vis-à-vis the sponsor but also towards his own derivative counterparty.  Moreover, whereas the sponsor of the ETF in North America is usually an independent firm (free to replace the book runner) in Europe the Sponsor and the book runner are one in the same.

I’m not saying that investors should avoid European ETFs, but I wonder how many investors realize that whey the buy the ETF for the CAC40 they are in fact taking a great deal of European bank risk, with virtually no recourse to the assets of these firms (they become an unsecured creditor).  Anyway it gives everyone something to ponder on this Thursday morning.

Popular posts from this blog

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more