Skip to main content

S&P downgrades Google following its acquisition of Motorola

First off rating agencies have lots o"splaining" to do with their rating activities.  No so many years ago, several rated all the Icelandic banks AAA -- based on the idea that they were TBTF and therefore had an implicit government guarantee.  Never mind that with a population of 230,000 Iceland's banks were dwarfing the local economy.

Then there was the rating of CDO/CLO and other bastardized complex financial structures, taking a bunch of BB rated debt instruments and magically creating AAA rated paper.

The downgrading of America was a "political" decision, in view of the intractable nature of the discussions in Washington, and the dogmatism shown by the republicans.  S&P's rating decision (America is still AA+ rated -- which is not so bad) is a true reflection of a government's spending decision and its inability to find realistic solutions to the problem.

The latest downgrade of Google that decided to acquire Motorola Mobile on Monday is sheer insanity.  First, Google has been looking at the handset business for some time -- its Android operating system is now the most popular smart phone OS, for every sale of Iphone there is two sales of Android powered phones.  The reality is that Google is more than a search company, its a data company.  Personally, I suspect that within 10 years the "telephone" aspect of most smart phone will be nearly eliminated (think skype) with data accounting for 90% of traffic and revenues.  The fact that Google is sitting on nearly $30 billion in cash (and short term instruments) tells you all you need to know on this acquisition:


  1. Google is looking at growing its data business, and handset complete the loop to the customer
  2. Google is using less than 30% of its cash at hand (should they go for an all cash offer)
  3. Culture clash is certain to occur, but then Google probably wants to keep hardware and software divisions in separate silos.
  4. Google's management has been looking for a "big project" for years.
  5. Real shame here is that Google could have bought Research in Motion for the same amount of cash (although competition issue would have been more serious)


Sure there are issues with keeping the OS development away from Google/Motorola phones will be difficult, but one of the many negative aspects of Android phones is that each manufacturer "damages the brand" with its overlay and tweaks that hamper the OS's strength.  Having a pure Google OS user will "force" other android phone makers to keep the OS as clean as possible.

BTW some disgree with my view -- a particularly well written comment here that basically takes the view that Google should have purchase Nortel's patents and not Motorola...

I really don't get the downgrading here!
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more