Skip to main content

Canadian Conservative Leadership Race (well not really but it needed to sound exiting)

 For the past six months, Canadian have been following the leadership race for the conservative party of Canada (no they have not, no one really cares except the party members).  The race has been close (not even), and the leader presents a true conservative pedigree of achievements and boldness (not really more of the same pablum).

There are two wings to the party, the economically conservative "lassez faire" wing (classical blue Tories) and the Western socially conservative wing of the party (think of the GOP today);  Anti-abortion, anti-Kyoto, Pro gun, anti-vaccine, against marriage equality etc etc.  There are three candidates for the leadership that matter but we will focus on two which represent the two extremes of the party: The race is between a socially conservative junior minister under Harper and the ex-prime minister of Quebec who was also the leader of the Federal Conservative Party when things were very bad.  The big news: Poilievre recently got the endorsement of Steven Harper, who was until a decade ago the prime Minister of Canada in which Poilievre was a junior (the carrot to keep the unruly quiet) minister.

The stage is set:  Now these two players are not equal in the eye of the party members, insofar as "secret" polls show that Poilievre leads Charest by 20 to 25%.  That Poilievre has reportedly sold more than 360,000  membership cards, that he has the support of virtually all conservative members of parliament, and has for a long time.  The question is, therefore, why did Harper give his sudden support to Poiliever?  It's certainly not desperation on the part of Poilievre, it may help to sway some voters to Poiliever but he's already so far ahead -- what would be the point?  

In my opinion, there are two reasons:  (1) Steven Harper wants to stay relevant, his 90-second endorsement of Poiliever was really more about how he had discovered and promoted Poiliever, and (2) to drive a nail in the coffin of Jean Charest's leadership bid, it is well known in political circles that Charest and Harper hated each other.

The impact of Harper's announcement could be interesting, depending on the polling results that Charest has gotten in the past few weeks he could leave the party and form a new economically conservative one! This would cause a massive problem for the Conservative Party because if they are flanked on the "left" by a new Charest party and on the right by the People's Party of Canada -- its policy range will be limited, especially with the ultra socially conservative that are in the prairies.

In the end, I don't believe that Poiliever will matter.  He will not be the Prime Minister of Canada, he is too socially conservative for the Ontario electorate.  Ontario conservative voters will not vote for the Liberals they will simply abstain in the upcoming elections ( 20/10/25)




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more