Skip to main content

TGV in Canada....its baaaaaack!

The wet dream of some bureaucrat the idea of building a high-speed train between Quebec City and Windsor.  A distance of 1,100 km with thousands of viaducts.  The Mexicans are, right now building a tourist train in the Yucatan and not a high-speed train and the total bill is just around US$ 20 billion, and that's going to be a diesel train.

It's a stupid project in Mexico, and it is even more idiotic here in Canada.  Problem #1 population density is just not there.  There are currently 20 flights a day with an average flight time of 75 minutes at a cost of C$ 250 return (so $125 each way).

Looking at the pure transport economic perspective:  Right now you can leave Montreal downtown at 6 am, and catch the 7:00 AM flight to Toronto, and be in the business district around 8:30 am.  So a 150-minute door to door.  The train has to equal that measure to be worthwhile.  The distance is 560 KM and a TGV  average speed of 320km/h so it could notionally do the trip in 200 minutes.  So the travel time is 50 minutes longer on the train than on the aircraft (add 20 minutes of traffic and you are closely matched).  However, for this to work the train would need a minimum of 12 departures per day.  Currently, there are ten per day, so again an additional two per day and the two mods of transport are comparable.  In terms of costs to passengers, the plane can be as low as $80 each way and the train NOW can be as low as $40.  

So right now, you can take a VIA Rail train from Montreal to Toronto (on average 5 hours) but as high-speed train would cut the travel time to 100 minutes the train would win.  The big difference is in cost to society.  The plane ticket pays for all services provided, from airport to traffic control to luggage handling, the cost includes everything, whereas there is virtually no way for the train to pay its way.  The French government indicated that the cost to build the TGV is 20 million Euro per Kilometer, A $65 billion price tag at 5% interest rate with a loan to value of 80% interest expenses alone would be 800 million per annum, or about $250 per passenger... or $1000 per round trip (10 trips a day 365 days a year, both direction) so 2.9 million passengers per annum.  

BTW as of today (08/02/22) there were a total of half a million passengers transported on Air Canada and Porter airlines (95% of all Montreal to Toronto flights) including connecting flights to Pierson airport.  Bottom line, for a TGV to be reasonable with a load factor of 80% then traffic between the two cities would have to rise eightfold.  Even then, the infrastructure cost per passenger of the TGV would be substantially more than C$250 each way.

Even in terms of pollution, all the electricity would have to be generated by green energy, which is not the case in Ontario where 95% of the rail link will be located -- so not that green either

This has all been debated in the Canadian press and the funniest bit is that again this is seen as a plot to give business to Quebec enterprises, specifically SNC Lavalin and Bombardier.  Only problem, Bombardier is no longer in the rail business and SNC has no special knowledge of rail transport.  knowledge 







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Tariffs on inhabited Island

 Two seldom-visited islands, part of Australia, saw a massive increase in the tariffs they will face when exporting to the United States.   The 32,000 residents did not have much to say...being Penguines.   NO kidding, massive tariffs were imposed on Heard Island and McDonald Islands.  According to the Australian government, the last visitor to Heard was about a decade ago.   Never mind the 47% tariff on Madagascar, where the principal export is Vanilla and the GDP per capita is less than $500 a year. Not only a Stable Genus but evidently an administration that took all of two hours to proof the list of countries.    They also treated St Pierre & Miquelon, two islands part of France in the middle of the St Lawrence Gulf...
Post a Comment
Read more

Britain, France and Egypt

 The voters realize now that the Conservative Praty desire to return to 19th-century dominance has driven its hatred of the EU.  The voters realize now that departure from the EU has accelerated Britain's decline and may soon make it irrelevant.  At best it will have to kiss American arses to maintain its standing.  For this, the conservatives were punished.  The decline of Britain was inevitable, competition from Frankfurt and Germany in Finance was bound to grow.  The core of Europe (aka Germany) is aging quickly Macron seems to be winning his bet, the left alliance that won the legislative elections will not remain united for long, since they disagree on about everything.   The Far right though it was about to assume power is once again relegated to the back of the bus.   It may draw its own conclusions, but not all of these are good for France.  The far-right has won nearly 1/3rd of the electorate, that is not something to be ig...
Post a Comment
Read more