Skip to main content

Data Centres – truth lies and the rest

First, what is a data centre?  It's simple, it's a large array of computers with very powerful graphic cards.  If you have a computer for gaming (or your son has one), you know that they run hot, and need a lot of cooling.

So the first thing is that data centers need a lot of cooling, it can be open or closed, but in either case data centers need a lot of water – because in 99% of cases water cooling is the best solution.   The next thing is that data centers need energy, a lot of energy, first to run their graphic cards but also to cool the cards.   Right now the ONLY solution is the grid, there is no other solution.  You could build a coal plant next to a data centre, but the fundamentals are the same, data centers are large energy consumers, full stop.  There have been "stories" about nuclear reactors for data centres, but the world is at least a decade away from such a thing happening.

Data centers are ubiquitous, far more than people believe – all emails, all cloud storage for one.   But also companies have moved their "computational requirements" away from their own machines to data centers, not only is it more economical it is safer and easily expandable.  So data centers are not only for AI, but also for large language models (aka artificial intelligence).

A lot of the criticism about data centers is justified, yes they increase the cost of energy locally, yes there has been a strong trend to "buy-off" local elected officials to grease the wheels of progress.  Some of the criticisms are also false, they are noisy (yes the old one which was air cooled).  Solar and wind energy is not the answer, it will never be the answer because data centres need energy 24/7.  Some of the criticisms are also self-serving, the "green movement" is against anything that will lead to an increase in fossil fuel consumption, and data centres do increase that demand, but it also "relocated" the demand.  In the past, companies and universities would own their own computational power – no more.  In short, data centres are here to stay because they meet a real societal need.  

However, there are other things that are true, first graphic cards don't last forever, especially when they are running 24/7.  The estimated life cycle of a graphic card is between 60 and 72 months.  Which brings another problem, the end of globalization.  The construction of a chip includes nearly 9,000 steps, with something like 2,000 companies that are "single providers" across the world.   Nevermind the invasion of Taiwan (step 8,800 out of 9,000), there are so many other places where the system can break down.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...