Skip to main content

My God they really hate Trudeau and Quebec

Big article in the National Post (a Canadian national newspaper...yeah they still exist), where it was disclosed who was and who was not invited to Queen Elizabeth's September 2022 funerals.  Obviously, Trudeau and his wife made the cut, but he also invited four ex-prime ministers and a bevy of others (there was only room for 10 "official" Canadians at the ceremony).  The big woop is that Sandra Oh was invited (she of Gray's Anatomy, and recipient of the Order of Canada ).  The article pointed out that the Prime Minister used his visit to the UK, where so many heads of state were present, to have informal conversations...only natural considering that the events would last only 2 hours and they were there for a few days.  

What was fascinating were the commentaries at the end of the article.  First, was the comment that Trudeau "fucked-it all up again" not entirely sure how he did that but at one point you have to realize that just hearing or reading about Trudeau is like a dog whistle to some.  It doesn't matter what he does or says it's bad.  It matters not what he did or didn't do, he's a bad actor!  Same story with the design of the new Canadian passport, its entirely possible that he saw a rendering of the thing, but I would be surprised if he had anything to do with its design, yet he was roundly criticized for some reason or other.

We have something very similar in Quebec, and I think it's a huge problem.  Two years ago, it was announced that Toronto Transit was looking at replacing some of its aging railcars for its GO network, and there was a discussion as to what that would entail, again this was in the National Post.  There was not a single word in that article about Bombardier or anything, but in the comments, there was a raging series of conversations that this was an opportunity for Trudeau to give to his friends in Montreal (e.g. Bombardier) a sweet contract.  For fun, I pointed out that Bombardier is no longer in the rail business.  I even point out to the commentator that there was no rail car business left in Quebec...it was all gone.  Nevertheless, the commentators persisted and said that Quebec would find a devious way to profit from the contracts available in Ontario.  It matters not what the subject is, to some in Ontario (and in Alberta too) there is a perception that everything wrong with Canada is Quebec's fault, true or not it matters not.

The reason I raised the issue of the UK, is that the UK had a similar relationship with the rest of Europe.  It was always Europe's fault and it was always some devious plot in Bruxel which would somehow disadvantage the UK. The pro-Brexit camp used this tool for years and years especially when the Conservatives were in power.  Whenever something bad occurred in the UK it was Europe's fault.  Thankfully it has not gotten that bad in Canada (aside from the famous transfer payments) overall there is surprisingly little inter-provincial trade, trade routes are North-South not East-West.  You just have to go to Toronto as a "real" French Canadian and the animosity is always surprising.  Again, that's not me!  I have no accent in English or French.  Nevertheless, you can see it in business meetings there.

This is a challenge for the province and its politicians and business people alike, to find a way back into the heart of the rest of Canada (granted Alberta may be difficult) is important.  It amazes me how easily Quebec politicians go out of their way to upset their Canadian counterparts.  There is no doubt among them a real sense that it is a waste of time and energy to try to have a serious dialog with the rest of the country.  Right now it's even worse because most of our senior politicians are successful ex-business people and as such are well aware of the prejudice they face when dealing with the rest of the country. 

There is no doubt, that for trade purposes our sights are, as ever, towards our American cousins, rather than our Canadian brothers.  Only 15% of Hydro Quebec's exports are to Ontario, it sells almost as much to New Brunswick with a population of less than one million.  !Ontario would rather build gas-fired power plants or nuclear power plants than purchase cheap energy from Quebec.  

Trade is not the way forward, accommodation, on the other hand, is, when Alberta wanted to reverse the course of a pipeline that took energy from Alberta all the way to the St-Lawrence seaway, it was the current Quebec government that denied the request based on some fake "green" reason.  Certainly, oil from oil sand production is far more polluting than other oil but to box in Alberta for no real reason than to be mean has a serious long-term impact.  

The question is what should Quebec do?  I have no answer to that!









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process
Post a Comment
Read more

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki
Post a Comment
Read more

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu
Post a Comment
Read more