Skip to main content

Canadian Income/Personal Debt Index is higher in Canada than the U.S – Really


  
Are we comparing apple and oranges here?  First off, we are comparing Personal disposable income.  While my American cousins’ harp about the fact that health care in Canada is not free, it is free as a portion of personal disposable income in Canada.  Whereas in America the average American spends nearly 20% of his disposable income on medical costs (I wish I was exaggerating – the math don’t lie!).

So the table that is often show that Canada has now passed its over indebted cousins would seem to compare to things that are not comparable.  So taking healthcare allocated revenues out of Americans disposable income reduces that index by 12%.  Which means that Canadian are not yet the worse of the lot… although we are working hard at changing this, as the direction of debt growth is for ever up while Americans are aggressively (willingly or otherwise) deleveraging.


The above graph shows the trend, and while Canada is “really” not as bad as the U.S. TODAY, the direction of both market is somewhat (huge sarcasm here) evident.  Canadians continue to borrow at unprecedented rate while the Americans are not (in fact the problems in America are becoming very severe with the destruction of credit facilities everywhere – shadow banking is in free fall). 

Bonus:  A friend recently relocated to Phoenix (big job and big salary) found a very nice house (actually a spectacular house for a very reasonable amount of cash) sought mortgages (non-conforming) from three lenders (well recognized financial institutions), the higher was for 71% LTV – not a problem for my friend, but the terms were far from interesting.  Eventually he picked a 50% mortgage – yes he invested 50% in cash.  No wonder the U.S. housing market cannot find its footing, if the minimum cash amount now required is 1/3rd of the purchase price (probably a good idea).  This to illustrate the dilemma facing the Federal Reserve tomorrow – at the very least “operation twist” is on, but they may have to do more.  Investors have lost all confidence in the system, and have chosen to protect capital instead if seeking return. 

Bonus 2: Yesterday, China “announced” that they were supporting Europe… yet at the same time Chinese banks are cutting European bank lines (BTW I totally agree with the Chinese banks position – this has been a constant refrain in North American financial institutions – the game is up in Europe, why stick around to pick up the pieces).  One thing that bankers have learned is you may be protected by your ISDA agreement if your counterparty fails, but it's September 2011 and my employer is still dealing with the Lehman legacy, we are still waiting for some of our collateral… 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more