Skip to main content

The trading rumors are insane

Over the weekend and the last two days, rumors of a fix for the Euro Area's crisis have emerged, this one using the European Investment Bank (EIB) as the vehicle of choice.  In a nutshell, the ECB would capitalize the EIB with Euro 200 billion, then the EIB would borrow another Euro 1.8 trillion (9:1 leverage) that would the proceed to buy (maybe at face value) all the sovereign bonds sold to European banks (maybe insurance companies too) and issuing instead an EIB bond -- that would have the full faith and credit of France and Germany.

First off, this was reported in one news organisation (CNBC)  -- and the details are only now being worked out, first being how will this impact the credit worthiness of Germany and France?  BTW, this is exactly what the original U.S. bail out was suppose to be, except that because we were talking about mortgage back securities (of various level) it was thought too complicated to get a "reasonable market price".  Maybe with only four credits (Ireland, Greece, Spain and Portugal) it would be much simpler... What is not simple is the impact on the credit of Germany and France of guaranteeing Euro 1.8 trillion in new borrowing.  Somehow, this doesn't solve the problem since the Euro 200 billion in equity is almost not enough to insure that further losses will not occur.  It is generally accepted now that of the Euro 400 billion in Greek debt, the necessary write-off is around 50%, so that country alone would account for 100% of the equity injected into the EIB structure.

Despite all that B.S. the markets have seen a 500 point rally -- based not on fact, but on a possible "solution" to the European crisis -- that would allow everyone to further delay the inevitable; Finally, this solution doesn't address Greece's current Euro 8 billion shortfall in funding needed by October -- it only deals with what has been issued, not what needs to be issued.

Strange times 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...