Skip to main content

Anti Regulation?

Unlike most of my peers, I am new to farming, having been in the business for only 5 years, I remember a time when I worked in the City and had an entire compliance department...

I mentioned that on the third Thursday of the month, many of the local farmers meet at a specific pub, and discuss general farming concerns, a few months ago our local MP was present.  He's a bit of a libertarian and mentioned the scourge of paperwork for farmers and that blablabla...Anyway, he asked what I thought of all the reports we prepared and how I was affected.  I told him, that on my farm we are unaffected, virtually 99% of all our reporting is done automatically, collated in the cloud, and that we spend less than 10 minutes a week worrying about agency reports, but that I doubt that anyone anywhere ever reads any of the 25 weekly reports we sent.

We are an industrial farm, and we produce 5 reports a day for various UK agencies, there are more than 200,000 farms in the UK, and assuming that 2/3rds are commercial farms, that means that on a good day, various agencies receive more than 600,000 reports from UK commercial farms.  What do you think are the odds that agencies are set up for dealing with big data from farms?  How about zero!

Farming and dealing with money are not the same thing, every minute of every day someone is trying to pull a fast one in the financial district.  Just check your Junk email folder, aside from certain appendage growth miracle products, most of the stuff is get-rich-quick schemes.  

The problem with agriculture is that some of our products are fungible; without a label can you tell if the broccoli in your hands is organic? It's even worse for tomatoes.  Yet the difference in price is significant.  Transforming an ordinary broccoli into an organic one will dramatically improve your profitability if you are not an organic farmer.  If that was the objective or paperwork, the day-to-day result of regulation then I could get on board, but none of it is concerned with that aspect.  And yes if someone offers you a 20% return -- it's a scam!

The number of reports being generated on a farm is substantial, and we only got the tail end of the European Union reporting requirements (We never reported to the EU for although we were a farm, Brexit had already passed and the implementation date was known).  But also our farm, from day one, received no subsidies of any kind, from any level of government.   

Note:  As a young man I travelled to India, with my then-girlfriend.  At one point for an unremembered reason, we were in a government official office in New Delhi.  We walked in and I noticed the wall at the back of his office, you could not see the wall to a height above my head, it was stacks of files, each file was tied with a red ribbon.. seriously  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more