Skip to main content

Our MP must be bored if they focus on bio security

Channel crossing has gone on for a long long time, and European imports for nearly as long.  More than 30 years ago the Channel Tunnel was finally completed.  Now our MPs are concerned with biosecurity!

Don't believe a word of it.  This is, the usual con job that is further trying to restrain imports from the continent.  By having a parliamentary committee, they are trial ballooning further rules and tests for the imports of foodstuff from the continent.

Farmers take two views; those who export can see future evident problems, where in a tit-for-tat war, the people who lose the most are UK farmers.  Farmers who operate only domestically, and they are a small minority are ecstatic because constrained demand will lead to higher prices.  In my opinion, those who will be the happiest are faux farmers who have a few organic cows that are just about breaking even.  Also, the likes of the morons that came to our farm, killed two goats and then brought a rather viral disease.  

Politicians are like magicians, they want you to look right when their real target is on the left.  The UK government continues to use "health" as a reason to slow or halt the import of foodstuff, and transport and duty expenses have risen dramatically since Brexit.   Let me give you a clue, it's not the European exporters who absorb the cost of these new regulations... it's the consumers.

Whenever I hear these consumer protection groups "screaming" about the abuse of the food industry, and require more supervision, more intrusion always seems to forget.  Some always pays the bill, and that someone is never the producer, it's always the consumers.

Granted most people don't understand that, even the President of the United States.  About 5 years ago, the US president introduced 10% duties and surcharges on imported washing machines.  Price to retail consumers rose by 30%. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...