Skip to main content

Tucker Carlson & Putin -- A way forward for the American right and what it meaning for UK Conservatives

Despite his improbable name, Tucker Carlson is a survivor in the US media world.  After having been ejected from the ultra-right-wing Fox News for his even by them toxic commentaries both on and off camera, he was able with the help of Twitter to survive and thrive.

There is no doubt that Mr. Carlson represents a vocal and active voice of America's hard right: Anti-democratic, supporters of strong men, in the mould of Pinochet and Putin, there is a very powerful and wealthy American class that despises the US electorate and believes that they alone should choose the leader.  

A few days ago Mr. Carlson interviewed President Putin who once again demonstrated Carlson's overall incompetence and slopiness.  He left obviously false statements by Putin unchallenged and made-up stories to aggrandize his feat in interviewing Putin.  

Putin is recognized as a brilliant and ruthless leader, who has controlled Russia with an iron grip for more than 20 years.  Carlson, the useful mouthpiece, enabled Putin to pass his message to his American fans unfettered by any filter.  Carlson only saw his popularity and brand-name rise in value, the only important metrics of success, since it translates directly into a higher income. 

In Trump, the American hard right see's an easily manipulated buffoon who will take his policy cues from Fox News evening sound bites.  The American hard-right correctly believes that a new Trump administration would be easily controlled to ensure that with the help of the already biased courts, they could pervert the US Constitution, and utterly destroy the American democratic political system.  They admire Putin for disqualifying his only rival in the upcoming elections. 

Here in the UK, the conservative media machine watches this all unfold in horror.  A good chunk of the conservative media machine historically took its policies from the US's right-wing think tanks, although they will not admit it, successful ideas from US right-wing had a habit of percolating into Conservative talking points (I saw this firsthand over many years, with the argument "It worked over there").

The strong pro-Putin support in America's far right is just too much for the UK Conservatives.  My sources within the policy machine tell me that part of their problem is that they cannot bring themselves to emulate most of America's hard-right policy prescriptions.  Granted 12 years has left many exhausted, but for the party, its historic source of ideas has become too extreme and unhinged.  Even for the crazy fringe of my old party.

Note: I had not really paid attention the first time, but it's evident that Carlson had a very specific agenda in his Putin interview; to portray him as a soldier of God, twice Carlson revisited to the idea of seeing the hand of God, and also the reason for invading was Eastward NATO expansion, and twice Putin said that (a) he didn't see the hand of god, (b) NATO had nothing to do with the invasion.  

Right there, he destroyed both of the most important far right narratives to support the invasion; that Putin was a soldier of God, and that NATO was the reason for invading.  I don't think his audience will notice, they are simply too dumb to believe there eyes and ears.  



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more