Skip to main content

Tesla & software

At the massive Tesla investor conference last week, the company stated that all of it's software had been developed in-house!  From sales, Human resources, management, and inventory, everything has been developed specifically by Tesla for Tesla!

A few months ago, Tesla's senior management came to Quebec, looking for a place in Canada for something (I suspect the battery business -- there's a lot of Lithium ore here).  Now, I am sure that they were courted in the "national capital" (that's what Quebec calls the province's capital -- Quebec City) and that there was a fun talk about what Quebec could bring to Tesla (great labor force and cheap energy).

I know most of the guys from the Quebec Government who would be part of these conversations, worked with them years ago, good solid, and bright but they probably didn't foresee the problem of software as an issue.  Tesla discussed, at its investor conference, that all its software, including management, was developed in-house replacing things such as Human resources or sales or other types of software because the stuff didn't meet Tesla's requirements.

Most people don't know this but the province of Quebec is monolingual French-speaking, everything has to be in French, and French alone.  Therefore it would be unacceptable that Tesla's computer systems to be in English.  Politically, it would be impossible for the Government to give an exception to Tesla -- because it has been hammered into our psyche by several pro-French groups that French is in trouble and needs to be further re-enforced (more so that it is now) and protected.

There you have it, the reason Tesla will NEVER set up in Quebec, it makes no sense for them to have to translate all their system into French, so once again Ontario will win out.  Years ago there was a joke when Visa did its IPO (the credit card people) there were two palaces in the world where it would be illegal to sell the IPO, North Korea and the Province of Quebec...

Now, Quebec has made a hard choice, this is not a criticism of the province's language policy.  In fact, I would really like it if French was better taught in schools and if vocabularies were more substantial and it does give the Province a little something.  But, there are consequences to this.  At no point will the issue of software be raised as an issue, it is only one of several issues that would make Quebec unattractive (this is true for any location), still it means that for a lot of the high-tech stuff, Quebec will always be passed over.  

Quebec's population, its politicians (who are a mirror of the will of the people) have made a choice and will have to live by that choice.  Tesla could have been great in Quebec, it would have been a fabulous engine to push the province's interests in North America, maybe it will but not via Tesla.  There is no lesson here, but rather a constatation that there are costs to actions and policies.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more