Skip to main content

Tesla & software

At the massive Tesla investor conference last week, the company stated that all of it's software had been developed in-house!  From sales, Human resources, management, and inventory, everything has been developed specifically by Tesla for Tesla!

A few months ago, Tesla's senior management came to Quebec, looking for a place in Canada for something (I suspect the battery business -- there's a lot of Lithium ore here).  Now, I am sure that they were courted in the "national capital" (that's what Quebec calls the province's capital -- Quebec City) and that there was a fun talk about what Quebec could bring to Tesla (great labor force and cheap energy).

I know most of the guys from the Quebec Government who would be part of these conversations, worked with them years ago, good solid, and bright but they probably didn't foresee the problem of software as an issue.  Tesla discussed, at its investor conference, that all its software, including management, was developed in-house replacing things such as Human resources or sales or other types of software because the stuff didn't meet Tesla's requirements.

Most people don't know this but the province of Quebec is monolingual French-speaking, everything has to be in French, and French alone.  Therefore it would be unacceptable that Tesla's computer systems to be in English.  Politically, it would be impossible for the Government to give an exception to Tesla -- because it has been hammered into our psyche by several pro-French groups that French is in trouble and needs to be further re-enforced (more so that it is now) and protected.

There you have it, the reason Tesla will NEVER set up in Quebec, it makes no sense for them to have to translate all their system into French, so once again Ontario will win out.  Years ago there was a joke when Visa did its IPO (the credit card people) there were two palaces in the world where it would be illegal to sell the IPO, North Korea and the Province of Quebec...

Now, Quebec has made a hard choice, this is not a criticism of the province's language policy.  In fact, I would really like it if French was better taught in schools and if vocabularies were more substantial and it does give the Province a little something.  But, there are consequences to this.  At no point will the issue of software be raised as an issue, it is only one of several issues that would make Quebec unattractive (this is true for any location), still it means that for a lot of the high-tech stuff, Quebec will always be passed over.  

Quebec's population, its politicians (who are a mirror of the will of the people) have made a choice and will have to live by that choice.  Tesla could have been great in Quebec, it would have been a fabulous engine to push the province's interests in North America, maybe it will but not via Tesla.  There is no lesson here, but rather a constatation that there are costs to actions and policies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu