Skip to main content

US Regional banks -- failures (update)

 What is going on in the US regional bank sector?  The press as usual got the wrong end of the stick.  In the case of SVB (Silicon Valley Bank), it seems that it was a run on the bank following poor quarterly results.  The FDIC guarantees deposits up to $250,000 so it's not entirely clear why ordinary people were standing in queue to get their money back.  More important is the $11 billion of institutional money that walked out of the door in the past 4 months. Apparently, the average deposit at SVB was $ 5 million...

Some say that it's the liquidation of its treasury portfolio that has given rise to the losses, but it's not like the cash usually sits in bank accounts doing nothing.  Moreover, if this was the case, then reserves would have already been set aside for these losses.

Something else is afoot here.  There was mention of SVB being one of the banks active in the crypto coin sector, which has seen wild price gyrations and some rather massive fraud in the past few months.

Still, it seems that the pain is growing and that other regional banks are feeling the pressure.  Janet Yellen said over the weekend that there would not be a government rescue for SVB (although buyers were making offers for the bank Sunday...).

It is strange that in this period when things in the US are relatively calm that suddenly there is a run on the banks -- strange!

Two things have now been confirmed vis-a-vis the SVB failure; (1) this is not asset driven, it's liability-driven, (2) all SVB deposits have now been guaranteed.  Now, that a CFO was stupid enough to leave more than 250,000 in a bank account just screams of stupidity.  I mean what the hell are money market accounts for otherwise.  Plain laziness.  

In addition, the management was less than careful, and succeeded in having fewer controls -- thanks to the past administration, that once again relaxed banking rules.  Still, the Fed put its finger in the breach and solve the short-term problem.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more