Skip to main content

The crazy greens

 So last night I was having dinner at a friend's house and their 17-year-old daughter was both pissed and vocal (it's a thing).  My friend and I were discussing the risk of war in Taiwan and at one point I spoke of China's demographic problem, that the population curve was inverted and this was the first time in history where this happened, and that China's population would over the next 50 years collapse and that there was nothing that could be done about it, the meaning in the conversation is that China had a small window of opportunity to invade Taiwan (in about 3/4 years).  

I didn't consider this to be a big issue, but rather a statement of fact, basic math.  Well, my friend's 17-year-old took me to task about this, not entirely sure where she was going with this, but it was a fun evening because I could see a glint in her father's eyes!  I was not family, a was just a random guy (BTW this was our third-ever meeting with the daughter).

So she says that (a) I'm wrong and (b) if I am right, it's a good thing.  It took her a few minutes to say all that, so I am summarizing it here.

So I said, as to the first, I've got no skin in the game, and statistics are statistics, granted the Chinese seem to have overstated their total population (its actually slightly above 1.2 billion rather than nearly 1.4 billion).  Somehow, I was using my "white privilege" in this statement, I told her kindly that statistics don't judge they reflect reality, but take no social impact position.  She finally agreed that I was right -- took a few minutes.

She then said that it was a good thing because the world could not sustain a population of 8 billion.  I said, I never made an issue of that when discussing it with her father, I just said that China, like many other countries would face rapid depopulation and that this would have a massive and unknown impact on the world.

She had not made the connection that a world of the 1950s where the population was 2.5 billion and where the vast majority was below the age of 15 and an 8 billion population where the majority was over 50 was not the same thing (she's 17 after all, and has no sense).  I mentioned here, that today in China for every retired person there are four people in the workforce.  However, by 2030 (a date she could understand), the proportion would be two to one, and it would get worse from there.  She still didn't get it, I said, people who are supported need money to live either "pensions" or savings.  The former are usually "unfunded" so it is paid by the current workforce.  

Now she got it!  She finally understood that when she turned 25 and paid taxes, a lot of her taxes were not to be serviced to her, but services to her parents.  It was funny to watch the change, very much like anyone who wants more government services and is happy that corporations or rich people pay additional taxes...but not so happy when they have to foot the bill.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu