Skip to main content

The lessons China learned from Enron

Article in the Financial Times about how local governments in China are making ends meet:

Step 1:  local government announces that a parcel of land is available for sale.

Step 2:  Local government sets up a private government-owned land-owning company on which it guarantees the debts and provides limited capital -- effectively a captive finance company backed by loans from the large Chinese banks

Step 3:  Auction off the land for development.  The local government already owns the land!

Step 4:  The company that the local government set up borrows 100% of the cost of buying the land from the local government.  

Step 5:  Local government pockets the proceeds from the sale of the land, and uses part of the proceeds as "normal income" and the rest of the sales proceeds to meet interest and principal repayment.

Step 6:  Hope no one notices

Step 7:  Once they notice, set up a better hidden New Land owning company, buy the land from the first buyer (which is you) at a much higher price and restart the process.

The story is that we are now on Step #10 of this merry-go-round.  The biggest culprits are the managers of the phantom cities... ever-rising land prices for land that one wants, that no one will develop.  

A Ponzi scheme just like Enron was all these years ago!

The impact is interesting because it means that the central government is only now becoming aware of the scope of the problem, which is the exposure that the main banks have to local governments.  Like Enron, no one noticed because no one talked (just like Enron), and stats were not compiled until the problem is so large that it can no longer be ignored --- that's when it ends up in the Financial Times of London.

As an aside, Enron used strong NDA language to ensure that bankers would not talk to each other about their Enron deals...everyone was shocked when they discovered that they were ALL being played by Enron.  When Enron went bankrupt (I was not involved) some colleague bankers were shocked by the number of transactions Enron had made (it was a carbon copy of what the Chinese are doing now).  I remember one instance, where Enron had bought a power plant, when it unraveled the initial price was $150 million, by the end of the game three years later an affiliate of Enron had purchased the powerplant for nearly $ 1 billion...the difference between the two figures was deal expenses, interest expenses, refinancing expenses, and plain theft, I cannot recall exactly (it was years ago, I was not in the deal team and was not even on the same continent) but I seem to remember that Enron's executives walked away would about $400 million.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...