Skip to main content

Bloomberg and Financial Times -- China in trouble

In the last few days, both the FT and Bloomberg published articles which stated that China's CCP is losing control of the economy.  Both articles had tons of supporting data, as one commentator put it, despite the level of self-denial about the scale of the problem facing China, the evidence is now overwhelming, and impossible to hide.  Tens of millions of empty apartments, a massive public debt burden, and appalling workmanship on both private and public projects are there for all to see.

Ten days ago I related my ex-employer client's real estate story that they had lost about 22% of the value of the real estate that had bought between 2010 and 2018, after selling all their domestic real estate holdings. I mentioned that I had no way of verifying this data.   Well, official Chinese government data shows an 8% drop in the last 24 months. A few days ago, the Chinese company that provides market pricing data for private real estate transactions stopped publishing.   This is not the first time the Chinese have stopped collecting/publishing inconvenient data (bond prices, youth unemployment, Covid death etc.). 

Yesterday, a house guest made an interesting commentary about China's military.  He said, the PLA's last two known foreign military actions showed their incompetence; the Sino-Vietnamese war of 1979, where the Chinese army grossly underperformed against Vietnamese forces, and the Chinese's 2016 UN-sponsored African adventure where the Chinese troops ran away.  

In addition, he said, China's one-child policy (1984 and 2015) created a nearly impossible recruitment dilemma; families cannot afford to lose their only future breadwinner to an early death.   Put simply, in China, the average IQ of military personnel is low, and they join because nothing else is available.  To make it even worse, over the past year, there appears to have been an ongoing purge of the PLA.  Several well-known officers have simply vanished.

Bloomberg and the Financial Times paint a bleak economic outlook for China.  If real estate prices are falling, and it accounts for 30% of the country's GDP, that real estate is a major component in regional governments' financial health, and represents somewhere around 80% of China's private wealth, the CCP has a major problem.  At one point the price for already-built, good-quality, empty apartments will be low enough to kill the new construction market.  if the overbuild is really as bad as rumoured, more than a third of China's economy could disappear overnight. 

By the way, their views are that things in China didn't suddenly deteriorate, rather the seeds have been there for a long time, but it's too evident now to hide.  Why should we care? Simply, the impact of an imploding China is impossible to quantify. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu