Skip to main content

China: Interesting but of no real concern

First of all, I am a farmer, so events in China have little to do with me, although two of our four tractors were built in China, and about half of the equipment on our biodigester was also manufactured in China.  I checked, so there is supply chain exposure.

After my dinner with friends of ours I went down the "Chinese rabbit hole" and one statistical item, if true, is catastrophic for the Chinese economy in general and savers specifically.  At least two Chinese government agencies reported that there are more than one billion excess apartments in China.  

Despite having left the firm some years ago, I am still good friends with the current chief economist, out of the blue he called me to congratulate me on the blog.   I thought that it was nice and we had a short conversation about China, and he said, the firm has no exposure so it's not a problem, plus the Yuan is not freely convertible so there is almost no systemic risk.

He then related the following story, he swore that this happened to a mainland Chinese client of the firm  The client is well-off.  Following the lifting of the Covid restriction, his family decided to sell all their domestic real estate holdings.  They sold twenty-two apartments in all,  mostly near Shanghai.   The client indicated that their average loss on sale of all the apartments was 22%.  The last one sold last week and they lost 88% of the purchase price.  In most cases these apartments had been owned by the family since 2010. The last one to sell was purchased in 2018 for the equivalent of US$ 850,000.  It sold for US$ 68,500 last week.  My ex-colleague tells me that his client is a contrarian, the family was shocked by the losses, but he insisted that they were better off selling now.  

Now this is second-hand information (if it's true at all) although I didn't seek this information and my ex-firm has no stake in the trade.  

This is where it gets interesting, since the early part of the summer, there has been a quantitative analysis of the exposure of each of my ex-firm's investments to China.  It should have been painstaking work, he said, but this is the amazing thing.  In 90% of cases, when my ex-firm contacted a portfolio company, they already had the analysis at hand.  It indicated one thing:  Not only investors but companies that trade with China are concerned not with risk-return but with physical exposure.  That means they are focused on capital preservation, and supply chain issues and not yield. 


  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump and Venezuela...

The US now owns Venezuela…and not in a good way.  America is not known for its nation building skills, and yet it now owns the disaster that is Venezuela.   Starvation and exodus are the natural progression.   In addition it will become a haven for narco-terrorists, more so than it already was. I am sure that Trump and his friends really thought that little attack very well…I guess that he will now attack Iran now.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more