Skip to main content

truth social nothing burger

True social media finally released its quarterly results for the second quarter ending June 30, 2024. The numbers were more or less in line with the revenues and losses of the previous quarter with total revenue of less than $1 million and total loss of about $16 million again, it only reflects the fact that revenues from advertising is dropping from the same period last year mainly because the revenues split had been modified after the IPO not, situation to make the company appear better before it is sold to investors. 

this all means nothing because it’s clear that true social as a platform like Twitter is not an effective tool. The company has already indicated that they wanna move into media business and that’s why they spend an awful lot of money in the first quarter for that objective in mind, maybe they will be successful in that endeavour but right now the revenues are not there and the profits are certainly not there. The stock is doing any stock with no revenues and massive losses. Do they keep on falling there has been no guidance provided by the company in terms of how things are when things will improve, which is somewhat unusual these these days but  I suspect that too much of their future earnings are based on things that they haven’t really announced yet it’s clear when this additional information will be made available but right now we have the information we have 

bottom line with these kind of results share price is still substantially too high at around $24 a share effectively. The company has about $344 million in cash and the share price should largely reflect the value of the cash at hand means that price would still have to go down about 95% to reflect that valuation $24 a share the company still worth around $4 billion which is very high. 

Overall, the reflection of political movement and desire to invest in Trump’s future rather than a real valuation for the company, which is currently run by politicians (old friends and colleagues of Donald Trump.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process

JD Vance -- Buyer's remorse (update)

Senator Vance like all human beings is a complex person.   He wrote a powerful book that was even turned into an excellent movie.  His "memoir" Hillbilly Elegy talks about a man who grew up in some level of poverty -- not exactly true, but then who cares, it was still an excellent book.    Being the running mate of Donald Trump cannot be easy, first and foremost President Trump is nuts and lazy.  It has been reported from several sources that one of his ideas was to create a 2,000-mile moat between Mexico and the US and fill it with snakes and crocodiles -- -not kidding here!  The bleach against Covid, there was a lot.  Not only has been proven to be ignorant he is also famous for doing absolutely nothing.   Senator Vance brought two things to the ticket Ohio (a swing state) and youth.  He is not 40 yet.   He was a great "anti-age" foil against Biden and to an extent Trump who is not a young man either, at 78.    However, part of the problem is that Senator Vance li

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will slap them with no-fly status. Update;  It seems that what they threw on the airc