Skip to main content

Why the anti-China protectionism

There are three ways to promote GDP growth: consumption-driven, investment-driven, and export-driven.   In other words, you build the stuff, you consume the stuff or you sell the stuff.   There is no other way!

For over 40 years China has been an investment-driven economy.   In 1990 China had zero high-speed train network, in 2024 it had like 30,000 miles of railway.   However, the demand for the high-speed railway is finite.   The same goes for housing.  We have seen it all over Europe, Spain, Portugal, and Italy all suffer from overabundant homes so that in parts of all these countries you can buy a house for a dollar.  Even Germany has nearly 2 million vacant homes (as opposed to underutilized ones) it was in their most recent census.

Since 2021 the CCP has realized that the investment route for GDP growth was no longer working.   More buildings would not solve the problem, and the second plank to raise consumption is impossible.  More debt will not solve the problem.   Higher wages have already been tried, in the past 20 years average wage has risen by 15x, so the Chinese government was left with only one option, to export its way out of trouble.   

What would have been more or less feasible in 1980 or 1990 is now impossible because China accounts for 17% of the world GDP and 30% of trade, it is the world's workshop, so even a small increase in sales abroad would be noticeable.   For example, in Europe, the sale of vehicles from China rose threefold.  The first, to react was the US government, both Trump and Biden are fundamentally protectionist, but again trade in America accounts for a very small percentage of GDP, outside of Mexico and Canada it's less than 5%.   So that meant that the target had to be Europe, and European companies as screaming murder. The governments are listening.

There is an excellent example on YouTube; a German company makes small brass components, in the manufacturing process the COST of the unprocessed brass is 0.26 euro per component, and the manufacturing cost is about 0.07 euro per component.   The Chinese are selling the component for 0.24 Euro, less than the cost of the brass stock.   BTW brass is brass, it's not like aluminum or other metals there is only one composition.  The Chinese are producing goods and selling them below cost, not to kill competition but to export their GDP growth, and create jobs at home.  

The protectionism is driven by a desire to stop China from using the export markets as a GDP growth engine.  Not only that, but China doesn't really have much room to manoeuvre in a trade war because it has largely stopped the imports of finished goods into China.  Even luxury brands now are hard to find in China.   

That's why the Chinese reaction to the massive trade barriers has been muted, there are no solutions.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....
Post a Comment
Read more

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...
Post a Comment
Read more