Skip to main content

Manna from Heaven – Foreign Direct Investment?

FDI has been, since I trained as an economist, the best form of investment that a country could hope to obtain.  Money invested for the long term that will result in job growth and revenues increases – even it turns out when the FDI is in the form of buying already existing companies it appears.

There is no doubt that Canada has a problem because the greatest bulk of foreign investments into Canada is either TSX60 companies or sovereign t-bills or bonds – highly liquid investments that can exit at the first sign of trouble (or better opportunity elsewhere).  Over the past 30 months (in fact shortly after the financial crisis) investors have looked at Canada favourably, its banks seem solid, and well capitalized, the housing market seems to be doing ok (in fact better than ok, it’s on fire!) which has resulted in more than $100 billion a year in investments (about 8% of GDP). We know that the Bank of Canada is concerned with all this "hot money", and how to minimize the risk it represents to the country (the economy and the currency).

Right now for Canada media the manna is Chinese since they are” sitting on billions of dollars” that is looking for a home to invest.  Hearsay is that in Africa in particular Chinese have been aggressive investors – although compared to America, which annually invests in excess of $300 billion abroad, the Chinese efforts have been small ($70 billion in 2010 – ranked #4 in the world).  The Canadian reality is that for Chinese looking for steady markets Canada has certain advantage, but is maybe not a very important consideration.  The reality of China’s massive investments into Africa (Senegal in particular) would seem to indicate that political (and economic) turmoil is not a critical consideration.

It remains, and hence the beginning of the commentary, that China has looked at many assets in Western Canada – in the oil and gas field in particular (Daylight Energy is the latest TSE:DAY).  However, as a method of “locking-in” resources for China the Canadian market is a poor substitute for poor and easily “influenced” countries in Africa – there is currently only two (full) pipeline (Vancouver & Prince Rupert) going from the oil rich Alberta to the BC coast. 

In fact, of Canada $560 billion in direct foreign investment, China accounts for only 2.7% -- a tiny participation that can easily grow from its current low base.  However, Canada doesn’t offer “resource security” since it would be almost impossible for China to export its production (as in a colony situation) back to China.  The analogy, as far as Canada is concerned is false – as such Canada will remain dependent on its historic “primary” source of FDI – United States of America.  


Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…