Skip to main content

North American median Income...growth

I've been thinking about this for a while, I've often written that there are fundamental difference between Canada and the U.S. and these are widening (despite what the Conservative government thinks) rather than narrowing.  

  • First, is the nature of the Canadian economy:  small and open energy and resource export driven economy.  Canada is no Qatar or Kuwait, where energy is 99% of its exports, it is far more balanced that  that, energy exports are important but not dominant, but it remains that Canada's strength lays in "heavy things that hurt when you drop them".  
  • Socially Canada is more homogeneous, and the Caucasian majority doesn't feel threatened...it is important to note that in the U.S. the Caucasian majority is only a few years away from no longer being the majority [BTW I'm not inferring any preference here, but note that the U.S. Tea party was mostly "Angry Whites" -- realizing that their "position" in America's economic system was eroding (the FoxNews "take-back" talk was "code" for "whitey man the barricades!"].  
  • Canada is not a military "super-power" (in fact we are hardly a military power -- we have been relying on america for our defense -- truth hurts, but its true nevertheless).  
  • The healthcare issue is supported by a wide consensus (of course some people will always complain) but the reality of our Southern neighbors with regards to health care is not enticing.  U.S. healthcare system is a cautionary tail:  Maybe our system is not "good enough" or "perfect" but one thing for sure the U.S. system is a disaster! and not something anyone should emulate.

The past 10 years have been very good to Canada and to Canadians in general, for while Canada does have income disparity, it is no where near the scope of what is found in America.  which brings me to the meat of my topic:  Median Income.

Median income is generally hated by politicians because it represents the absolute middle income -- literally half the population earns more and the other half earns less.  Unlike average which can be pulled by the rich getting a lot richer!   The American reality is that median income has been static (read falling) for more than a decade.  


(source: Medicare Tax Base)

Importantly, from this figure Americans must also subtract health care expenses -- which have been rising at nearly 7% p.a. for over a decade.  The earning power of the median American has dropped dramatically.

Looking at Canada:


(Source:  StatsCan)

Shows a very different picture.  It is important to note that the '90s were not kind -- Canadian income suffered under Paul Martin's 1995 massive debt correction (our version of Greece), so there is some catching up here.  Also the numbers are not strictly comparable, first because we are looking at family and not individual income, and also because of the health care component -- BTW these figures are after tax in both cases!

The housing bubble in the U.S. was driven by "median" American's attempt at maintaining the fiction of income growth (according to some, median income has been stagnant for nearly two decades -- but inflation and other adjustment can make data say anything) that simply didn't exist.  As such it is remarkable that Greenspan never did a 2+2 analysis of the data -- which was apparent, house prices were rising while income was stagnant, the only factor that "improved" where interest rates -- by definition there is a lower limit to interest rates (zero if you doubt to thought process).  In a sense, Republican politicians are correct that the house crisis "began in Washington".  The bubble would have lasted much longer (less intense) had Wall Street not gone crazy in 2004 and refrained from lending money to people who had no means to make even the first mortgage payment!

However, the median income data shows one thing very clearly, is that the Canadian situation (based on our resource rich economy) is very different to that of the Americans  doesn't mean we are out of the woods (by any stretch of the imagination), but it does show that those who borrow have seen an absolute increase in the income (average income will grow more quickly), it doesn't mean that Canada's housing market is now near or at bubble level -- Toronto and Vancouver in particular are very frothy. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trucker shortage? No a plan to allow driverless rigs

There are still articles on how America is running out of truckers -- and that its a huge problem, except its not a problem, if it was a problem salaries would rise to so that demand would clear. Trucking is one of those industry where the vast majority of participants are owner/operators and therefore free agents.

Salaries and cost are extremely well know, "industry" complains that there are not enough truckers, yet wages continue to fall... Therefore there are still too many truckers around, for if there was a shortage of supply prices would rise, and they don't.

What there is though is something different; there is a push to allow automatic rigs to "operate across the US", so to encourage the various authorities to allow self driving rigs you talk shortage and hope that politicians decided that "Well if people don't want to work, lets get robots to do the work" or words to that effect.

This has nothing to do with shortage of drivers, but every…

Every punter says oil prices are on the rise: Oil hits $48/bbl -- lowest since September 2016

What the hell?

How could this be, punters, advisors, investment bankers all agreed commodity prices  in general and oil prices in particular are on the rise...its a brave new era for producers and exporters -- finally the world is back and demand is going through the roof, except not so much!

What happened?  Well energy is complicated, the world operates in a balance -- 30 days of physical reserves is about all we've got (seriously) this is a just in time business.  So the long term trend always gets hit by short term variations.

Global production over the past 12 months has risen by somewhat less than 1.5% per annum.  As the world market changes production becomes less energy intensive (maybe), but the reality is that the world is growing more slowly -- America Q4 GDP growth was around 1.9% (annualized) Europe is going nowhere fast (the GDP growth in Germany is overshadowed by the lack of growth in France, Italy, Spain (lets say 27 Euro members generated a total GDP growth of 1.2…

Paying for research

This morning I was reading that CLSA -- since 2013 proudly owned by CITIC -- was shutting down its American equity research department -- 90 people will be affected!

Now the value of a lot of research is limited, that is not to say that all research is bad. In fact, I remember that GS's Asia Aerospace research was considered the bible for the sector.  Granted, there was little you could do with the research since the "buy" was for Chinese airlines...that were state owned.  Still it was a vey valuable tool in understanding the local dynamics.  It seems that the US has introduced new legislation that forces brokers to "sell" their research services!  Figures of $10,000 an hour have been mentioned...

Now, research can be sold many times; if GS has 5000/6000 clients they may sell the same research 300x or 400x (I exaggerate) but this is the key -- Those who buy the research are, I presume, prohibited from giving it away or selling it, at the same time the same rese…