Skip to main content

Apple's dilemna; flagging sales and slumping share price

We've seen this story before.   30 years ago, laptops would be replaced every year, the capability of new machines was demonstrably better than the older ones.  Now not so much.   Give anyone a 15-year-old MacBook and this person will be hard-pressed to tell you in what year it was manufactured.   For 99% of daily applications, there is no difference between a new and an older machine.

When the iPhone came out in 2008, yes it has only been 15 years, the phone was groundbreaking, and many resisted but in the end, the combination of ease of use, the App Store and the blind stupidity of Research in Motion (aka the company that invented the blackberry) made frequent upgrades for your phone a must.  Every year or so a new phone was needed.

Rolling on to 2024, and most people have changed the way they use their phones, fewer calls, more text messages, mean the phone doesn't work as hard.  In addition, you have to check the BIOS to know what model you have in your hand.   You have to "know" to tell the difference between a model 10 and a model 15 (the 16 is just around the corner apparently).  They look the same, they work the same, and the scenes may be better but you would be hard-pressed to identify which is really better.

The iPhone is the victim of its own success, It is no longer seen as a luxury item, it's just something you need, its a staple and not an aspiration device.

Enters Apple corporation.   The last remotely interesting device they introduced was the watch, personally a $300 watch that will work for only a few years seems a waste, considering that I purchased my Seikko perpetual in 1997 and it still looks as good today as it did the day I bought it (it also tells the time just fine), plus I like that my phone is not with me, and that I am not connected.

The $6,000 Apple goggles were a novelty that has already died down.   The reality is that it's still not ready for prime time, and it may never make the cut, the latest iteration has interesting aspects, but you look like a moron wearing these things.

Apple is at a loss as to what to do with its mountain of cash, the solution is obvious, either buy Tesla or give it back to the shareholders, their buyback is fiscally the most efficient since the tax implication is better, dividends are income, appreciation of share price is capital gains, for American investors the tax rate is half the other.    

So this morning Apple announced (implied) that they will start buying back their shares.   Unfortunately, it also tells you that Apple is hard-pressed to find anything in which to invest its excess cash.   The reality is that Apple is a vertically integrated computer company, its foray into the content business has been better than most, and Apple+ is seen as one of the better channels with groundbreaking and interesting content.   The same cannot be said for Paramount or even Amazon, both trail Netflix and are, by the way, mostly domestic, nearly 50% of Netflix's income is from foreign sources.

Still, the signs are there, Apple is a mature company in a mature industry, it will continue to build computers, tablets and telephones, but it is no longer the "tech play"it has been for the past two decades.   Someone said that the last "new product" was developed by Steve Jobs.   The man has been dead for a while now.   It still makes great products, but the pipeline is thin, and as such share share seems to be an excellent idea

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what people get wrong about tariffs

 The issue is simple. What percentage of the economy is dependent on tariff goods? The truth, is that the US economy is far more closed than people understand. People genuinely believe that all manufacturing has ceased to exist in the United States all given to China on the altar of woke policy the truth can be further from That statement. Only about 15% of US GDP is related to foreign trade. Of that amount, slightly more than half is from Canada in Mexico. And half of that is energy. What that means, is that about 7% of US GDP is tariff dependent. The proof in the pudding, is how little money tariff generates. People think that 30 or 50 billion is a lot it’s not in an economy that has $3 trillion. The impact on the US economy will be less visible but not absent. Inflation hasn’t occurred yet first because tests have hardly started to bite, but more importantly it’s such a small percent of the economy. Now certain things are critical. The rare earth metals from China were critical....

The end of Tesla?

 it takes a special kind of idiot, to think that he can antagonize his entire customer base, and think that it will not impact his business. When Elon Musk went to work for Donald Trump, and created the doge department, he antagonized every liberal, and these people represent 90% of his client base.That’s not a brilliant move. Now Elon Musk is worth hundreds of billions of dollar, so he shouldn’t care a great deal, however, he needs to care because of several other issues. The cyber truck has been a disaster, most have had to be recalled because of defective glue, it’s not a truck, it’s not a car, it’s noisy, relatively uncomfortable, but great as a development platform. What Tesla has learned in making car manufacturing more seamless is truly amazing. The problem was that Elon Musk was so pissed with the Democrats, and with Joe Biden, in particular because of some slight, which were just plain stupid too. By the way, that he decided to support with hundreds of millions of dollar, ...

Demographics

 I am preparing a kind of family tree for our children so that they know where they came from.  In my family I am the only survivor, although my brother and sister died recently they were both in their seventies (a story I told already).    It was a fun process, but it provided more than that.  First, I married relatively young I was 26 when I married and nearly 30 when our first child was born.   I was looking at my ancestors.  On my mother's side, she had 6 siblings, Four died before the age of 30, two in war, and two from illnesses.  Only she and a single sister survived.   The two boys had a child each but they died in WWII, and the other sister died as an infant.   what is interesting is that every one of my mother's siblings had children in their early 20s.   I know that my mom was hardly 20 when my brother was born.    What is remarkable is that among our friends, we are the only ones to have fou...