Skip to main content

Andrew, Andrew, Andrew what have you done.

Over the past few months, I have mentioned my somewhat royalist outlook.  I liked the Queen, and think that King Charles has some good qualities as a sovereign, but there are several things that I find questionable.

I think that Andrew is King Charles' kryptonite (hey I grew up on cartoons too).  Let's be clear, right now the royal family seems more supportive of a pedophile than a guy who married a "black woman" (get the hint right!).

This is not only true of the Royal family it's also true of the British press.  Certain segments (mostly to the right) have taken a rather uncalled position vis-a-vis Harry and Megan and yet seem to give a pass to Prince Andrew.

It is impossible that King Charles was not aware of the extent of Andrew's problems.  Although from listening to Andrew's ex-wife it seems that, she at least, was not aware of the extent of her ex-husband's predilection.  It seems that he was able to successfully lie to his ex and probably his children.  But the King would have been informed through unofficial channels (the relationship between the US and the UK is too close for the unvarnished truth not having made it to our shores).  It is also more than likely that the British government was made aware of Andrew's actions.  

Despite all this, the King continues to support his brother in public.  That Andrew was so publicly around during the Christmas break surprised me, and gave a very strange vibe in the English countryside.  I want to mention this because of the comment we heard as we left church this morning.  First, there are several articles in the Sunday broadsheet about Epstein and Andrew and even visits by Epstein to the United Kingdom apparently with the objective of "spending time with the royal family".  I have no idea if this is true, if it was simply a desire by Epstein and his right-hand woman Gislaine Maxwell (yes the daughter of the infamous Bob Maxwell).  

As they say, this cannot be good.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spray painting Taylor Swift G650 aircraft (updated)

 First, a bit of paint will not harm anyone.  These climate activities are going to learn two things in the next few days:  (1) Trespassing at an airport is a felony almost anywhere in the world.  That means criminal prosecution.   (2) removing paint from an aircraft is expensive.   So these climate activists are about to find out the reach of the British criminal system and it will not be pleasant, the UK has very strict laws about that, I would be surprised if cleaning the aircraft of all the paint will cost less than $100,000.     I am sure that when they planned (premeditation) this little show they had a very valid logic to doing this.  Tonight, they are probably realizing the depth of their troubles.   I understand that in the UK it's a minimum one-year jail sentence.    Also, good luck travelling with a criminal trespass charge against you.  I am relatively certain that the airline industry will ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Janet Yellen from China supporter to Hawk...

There is rarely serious news in the world these days, it seems that most newspapers are filled with headlines and little else, and then Ms Yellen went to China.  Secretary Yellen has long been known in the Biden administration as the voice of moderation when dealing with China, yet as her trip which concluded yesterday a hawk was born:  She warned the Chinese against dumping goods in the United States.    fighting words! The American administration is very concerned about the lack of Chinese domestic consumption.   Even before the COVID-19 epidemic, there were already the beginning signs of a slowdown, automobile sales were off.   China is facing domestic deflation (a clear sign of collapsing demand) China imports few consumer goods, they import raw materials and intermediary goods.   It seems that the American administration is concerned that the Chinese administration will dump consumer goods abroad to keep its manufacturing machinery ...
Post a Comment
Read more