Skip to main content

Imagine this conversation in the court of appeal

Imagine a King's Counsel for Boris Johnson is before the Appeal's Court to plead that Mr. Johnson cannot be held for crimes because he was the prime minister when the crimes occurred, and that his position as a member of parliament and prime minister gives him total immunity from prosecution.  One of the judges sitting on the court asks a hypothetical question:  If Johnson's claim to total immunity is true, it means that he could have asked the SAS to murder the leader of the opposition with no consequences.  The KC then says:  Yes!

Obviously, I am transferring the question from what is going on in the US.  In the UK and most countries members of parliament are only protected from prosecution for slander...that's because, under the UK system, there is no criminal immunity it is a fundamental tenet of the British Constitution that all are equal before the law (and we don't even have a written constitution).

Our American cousins are testing these waters right now with Trump.  He and his legal team have now decided that ex-Preisdent Trump is immune forever to everything.  He even tried to get his conviction for sexual assault (actually rape) overturned because he was a President at one point (the rape occurred years ago, the court case has been going on for years), and he was found guilty (in civil court) long after he was no longer president.  He lost that appeal spectacularly just two days ago.

What is truly interesting for an outsider, is to consider what is the real game.  Trump's team's objective is to delay, obfuscate and muddy the waters to give a conservative-leaning Supreme Court the ability to reject the entire premise behind the Court of Appeals's current actions (even the members of the Court of Appeals have questioned their right to hear the case).  The entire show is to delay the entire "criminal liability" issue until after the elections.  It makes perfect sense.  Polls after polls have shown that Trump's support from independents (which is between 20% and 40% of the electorate), collapses if he is found guilty of a crime.  This whole show is not about right, wrong, guilty or not, it's about winning the next election cycle.  The conservative movement (or what's left of it) is tied to Trump willingly or otherwise.  They are fully aware that their movement is in trouble, but they will solve that after the elections.  Right now the objective is to give the Supreme Court the cover to reject hearing the case.  The lawyer representing Trump did something spectacularly stupid, but it's just for show.  Watch the real game, because Trump's lawyers will not bring things to the Court to show that it doesn't have jurisdiction.  When Trump loses, the Supreme Court will not decide against Trump, they will simply say, that the Court of Appeal did not have the right to hear the case...therefore, giving Trump the electoral pass he needs.

Over the past 40 years, the US conservative movement has successfully gerrymandered the electoral map so that for a Democratic contender to win the Presidency, he/she needs about 56% of the popular vote to win sufficient electors.  My guess is that the 2024 GOP election machine will be even better run, to ensure that even then the will of the people will be thwarted.  

Here in the United Kingdom, such a question would never be asked by anyone, because in the UK, all are equal before the law.  Our American cousins are trying hard to prove that in America, the law is otherwise.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process
Post a Comment
Read more

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki
Post a Comment
Read more

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu
Post a Comment
Read more